Sammanfattning på svenska

Two separate data searches underlie this analysis of how references to educational research and to PISA are used in the Swedish education debate. The data consist of 380 newspaper articles from the eight largest print media outlets in Sweden and 200 protocols from parliamentary debates (2000 to 2016) that made explicit reference to 'PISA' and/or to 'educational research'. Based on a content analysis of this material, in which notions of policy borrowing and de-/legitimization are central, we describe the result as a selective use of PISA data and of educational research in the education debate. PISA is used to legitimize selective (party political) solutions that are oriented towards problems of teaching. The analysis also shows that politics and the media debate concerning education seems disinterested in educational research in a broader sense and that PISA seems to offer sufficient and 'neutral' authoritative knowledge and support for policy and reforms. We argue that PISA is the first way to obtain legitimate support for educational reforms. In so doing, the kinds of problems that these reforms aim to solve have been narrowed down to teaching-or practice-oriented problems.

Previous research in science education has suggested that difficulties among students learning science relate to challenges in framing its discourse. This article examines the role that language plays in a scientific literacy test for which everyday life is an augmented aspect. Video-recorded data was collected in four ninth-grade science classes in a Swedish compulsory school as small groups of students discussed and collaboratively solved PISA science test items. The theoretical framework assumes sociocultural perspectives as well as that of Wittgenstein's later works on language. The study involves an analysis of students' meaning making of specific words that occur in the test and the various language games to which these words contribute. Specifically, we analyzed the students' use of four different words: reference, constant, pattern, and factor. We found that the students use these words in everyday or mathematical language games; for example, understanding the word "pattern" as a mathematical regularity rather than a result of a scientific experiment. The results were analyzed in relation to the specific illustrations and wording that contextualize the items. We argue that a crucial part of being scientifically literate is privileging science content over other possible disciplines and contexts and ignoring the everyday perspective.

Countries with large numbers of students who struggle to master basic reading skills at age 15 are likely to be held back in the future, when those students become adults who lack the skills needed to function effectively in the workplace and in society. Among students who fail to reach the baseline level of performance (Level 2) in mathematics, reading or science, most can be expected not to continue with education beyond compulsory schooling, and therefore risk facing difficulties using mathematics, reading and using science concepts throughout their lives … Even in the average OECD country, where more than one in five students does not reach Level 2, tackling such low performance is a major challenge. (OECD, 2013, p. 254, our emphases in italics)Keywords: performance; competency; PISA; students; STS; scientific literacy This quote is from an OECD publication that reports the results from the 2012 PISA survey, on which the above analysis is based. The Swedish PISA results from that year were the lowest ever in all three knowledge areas at stake, which shocked the nation. Since low performance on the PISA is put forward as serious personal and societal risks, this concern is expected. In December 2013, the Swedish results were broadcast directly from a press conference held at the National Agency of Education. The message was that the results were very serious, overwhelming, and signaled a school system in crisis. During the press conference, Director-General Anna Ekström also emphasized her confidence in PISA: 'Here at the National Agency for Education, we trust PISA' (Ekström, 3 December 2013). Through this broadcast, and massive media reporting, the crisis of the Swedish school system became publicly indisputable. Although we share the view that many things probably would be in place to strengthen Swedish schools, we find this type of unreserved faith in PISA as evidence of educational failure or success, to be problematic. In this article, we make an attempt to unpack what we would term the taken-for-granted notion of low performance. Using the theoretical lens of Michel Foucault (1971), and particularly Bruno Latour's (1999) STS studies, our main thesis is that low performance is not a given category, but a reality performed into being by students, test instruments, and measurement rationality.In the global structure of education, understanding what important knowledge 'is', and what could be its missing parts, has become a grand narrative of our time, with help from the idea of a globalized educational system (Novóa, 2013). Actors in the global education market (or rather, instigators at the Organisation for Economic Co- * Email: margareta.serder@mah.se 2 operation and Development [OECD], the European Commission, the World Bank, and UNESCO (Grek, 2009; Lawn & Grek, 2012;Morgan, 2009) for international assessments such as PISA are constructing the standards for what is a successful student or a successful nation.However, the role of PISA deviates from other assessments in that it constitutes the very in...

No abstract

No abstract

Growing demands on evidence-based teaching, combined with increasing business involve-ment, constitute a transformation of education in which research and research collaborations have become commodities and selling points for companies. This article, building on interviews with 30 Swedish edupreneurs, explores how the discursive trope of the Triple Helix organises collaborations between the business sector, research, and school. In what ways do people in edu-business use research and research collaborations and what kinds of values do they expect to produce through different practices? The study identifies five approaches to research -philanthropists, influencers, ambassadors, brokers, and engineers -and describe the edupreneurs' manifold ways of using, relating to, and translating research into sellable products. Using the theoretical lens of assetization, we show how different values are produced: (1) economic -strengthening the company's brand; (2) pedagogical -changing teaching practices; (3) politicallobbying for policy change and changing public conversations; (4) academic -defining useful research and funding research, and (5) social -building networks. We conclude that the striving for Triple Helix collaborations preserves the entrepreneurial right to define useful research and providing legitimacy through the power of research, an important asset on the edu-market.

No abstract