Two experiments investigated the modulation of event-related potentials (ERPs) by the repetition of orthographically legal and illegal nonwords. In Experiment 1, subjects silently counted occasional words against a background of nonwords, a proportion of which were repetitions of an immediately preceding legal or illegal item. ERPs to repeated legal items showed a sustained, topographically diffuse, positive-going shift. In contrast, repeated illegal nonwords gave rise to ERPs showing a smaller and temporally more restricted positive-going modulation. In an attempt to equalize depth of processing across legal and illegal nonwords, subjects in Experiment 2 were required to count items containing a nonalphabetic character against the same background of nonword items. ERPs to repeated legal items showed a modulation similar to, although smaller than, that found in Experiment 1, but no effects of repetition were observed in the ERPs to the illegal nonwords. It was concluded that the effects of repeating nonwords, at least as manifested in concurrently recorded ERPs, differ as a consequence of whether items can access lexical memory, and that this is inconsistent with the attribution of such effects solely to the operation of episodic memory processes.The beneficial effects of the prior presentation of a word on the efficiency with which the word is processed on a subsequent occasion have been described in numerous studies that employed identification (e.g
The modulation of event-related potentials by word repetition was investigated in two experiments. In both experiments, subjects responded to occasional nonwords interspersed among a series of words. A proportion of the words were repetitions of previously presented items. Words were repeated after 0 or 6 intervening items in Experiment 1 and after 6 or 19 items in Experiment 2. Event-related potentials to repeated words were characterised by a sustained, widespread positive-going shift with an onset of approximately 300 ms. This effect did not vary significantly as a function of lag in either experiment. When words were repeated immediately, this repetition-evoked positive shift was preceded by a transient negative deflection (onset ca. 200 ms) which was absent in event-related potentials to words repeated at longer lags. These results suggest that the modulation of event-related potentials by word repetition is influenced by at least two processes. One of these processes acts relatively early during the processing of a repeated word, but subsides rapidly as inter-item lag between first and second presentations increases. The second process occurs later in time, but is considerably more robust over variations in inter-item lag.
SUMMARY Event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded from 19 closed head injury (CHI) patients, at least 6 months after injury, and an equal number of control subjects, during a task requiring the covert counting of rare auditory "target" stimuli against a background of frequent "non-targets". In both groups, ERPs to targets contained enhanced frontal N2 and parietal P3 components. N2 was larger in amplitude in the CHI patients than in the controls, and its peak latency was delayed. P3 amplitude was smaller in the patients, but its latency was not significantly different from that of the control group. The delay in N2 latency is interpreted as evidence of an increase in the time needed to achieve stimulus categorisation in CHI patients. The larger N2s in this group are thought to reflect the additional cognitive effort required after CHI to cope with the task. The negative findings with respect to P3 latency suggest that this may be a less sensitive measure of information-processing efficiency in this task than the latency of N2.Individuals who suffer a closed head injury (CHI) often demonstrate one or more of a characteristic range of cognitive dysfunctions. These include depressed intellectual performance,1 3 poor long-term memory,4 5 and poor performance on tasks requiring speeded processing and decision making, as for example in the cases of 4-choice reaction-time6 7 and paced auditory serial addition.89 Although these sequelae are well known, there has been little attempt to relate them to indices of cerebral function such as scalprecorded event-related potentials (ERPs). ERPs are an attractive means of investigating closed head injury because of their "real-time" nature, and the fact that they are sensitive to a range of cognitive variables. They therefore offer a means of assessing information-processing efficiency independently of overt behavioural measures, and in particular, they provide a relatively direct way of investigating "early" stages of information-processing. Moreover, by determining the distribution on the scalp of ERP Address for reprint requests: M D Rugg,
Event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded in a GO/NO-GO reaction time task from 20 closed head injury patients, at least 6 months postinjury, and from 20 controls. In this task the pitch of an initial tone (Sl) indicated whether or not a response was required to a second tone (S2) occurring 1.5 s later. In the control group both the early, frontal-maximum, and the later vertex-maximum, components of the contingent negative variation (CNV) were larger on GO than NO-GO trials. In the patients, the early frontal CNV wave did not differentiate GO and NO-GO trials, and the late CNV showed a smaller separation between these trial types than did the late CNV of the control group. These CNV abnormalities may reflect impairments in selectively orienting to salient stimuli, and in differential response preparation. Such impairments might in turn reflect the damage to the frontal lobes and/or their connections that commonly occurs as a result of closed head injury.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.