The national education department's inventory record is unique because the goods are in schools under service, not in the office. Inventory complexity has increased due to the procurement of different schedules and reports, not only for internal but also for other institutions concerned. A structured and accessible inventory from anywhere is the right choice for the effectiveness and efficiency of this work. This research aims to design a website-based information system for goods inventory in the National Education Office (DISDIKNAS). The software development method used in this study is the Rational Unified Process. The study results obtained a web-based application that can help DISDIKNAS inventory goods in a structured and accessible anywhere
The important role of collocation in learners' language proficiency has been acknowledged widely. In Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL), collocation is known as one prominent member of the super-ordinate lexical cohesion, which contributes significantly to the textual coherence, together with grammatical cohesion and structural cohesion (Halliday & Hasan, 1985). Collocation is also viewed as the hallmark of truly advanced English learners since the higher the learners' proficiency is, the more they tend to use collocation (Bazzaz & Samad, 2011;Hsu, 2007;Zhang, 1993). Further, knowledge of collocation is regarded as part of the native speakers' communicative competence (Bazzaz & Samad, 2011); and lack of the knowledge is the most important sign of foreignness among foreign language learners (McArthur, 1992;McCarthy, 1990). Taking the importance of collocation into account, this study is aimed to shed light on Indonesian EFL learners' levels of collocational competence. In the study, the collocational competence is restricted to v+n and adj+n of collocation but broken down into productive and receptive competence, about which little work has been done (Henriksen, 2013). For this purpose, 49 second-year students of an English department in a state polytechnic were chosen as the subjects. Two sets of tests (filling in the blanks and multiple-choice) were administered to obtain the data of the subjects' levels of productive and receptive competence and to gain information of which type was more problematic for the learners. The test instruments were designed by referring to Brashi's (2006) test model, andKoya's (2003). In the analysis of the data, interpretive-qualitative method was used primarily to obtain broad explanatory information. The data analysis showed that the scores of productive competence were lower than those of receptive competence in both v+n and adj+n collocation. The analysis also revealed that the scores of productive and receptive competence in v+n collocation were higher than those of productive and receptive competence in adj+n collocation. The finding comes as a surprise since it turns out adj+n collocation is more problematic than v+n collocation both productively and receptively. Much research, by contrast, has reported that mistakes in v+n collocation are typical (Al-Zahrani, 1998;Nesselhauf, 2003;Liu, 1999;Sun, 2004). A conclusion has even been drawn that "v+n collocation is more difficult than adj+n collocation" (Kuo, 2009, p. 148). Though more studies are needed to support its finding, this research suggests the type of collocation deserve to get more attention from researchers.
Abstrak Microsoft Teams (Ms Teams) adalah salah satu platform yang memungkinkan penggunanya untuk berkolaborasi, berbagi dokumen, maupun mengadakan rapat secara daring. Dalam konteks pendidikan, Ms Teams menjadi salah satu alternatif platform digital yang mendukung terlaksananya penerapan 4C (critical thinking, creativity, collaboration, dan communication) selama pandemi. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui bagaimana integrasi kompetensi 4C melalui penggunaan Ms Teams dalam pengajaran Bahasa Inggris. Melalui metodologi deskriptif kualitatif, penelitian ini menggunakan kuisioner, observasi dan studi pustaka terhadap pelaksanaan pengajaran Bahasa Inggris 1 dan 2 di dua prodi selama dua semester berturut-turut di tahun akademik 2020-2021 dan mengkaji bagaimana penerapan 4C tersebut. Penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa (hasil). Dengan demikian, (kesimpulan). Kata Kunci: 4C, Ms Teams, pembelajaran daring, Bahasa Inggris AbstractMicrosoft Teams (Ms Teams) is one platform that enables the users to collab, share documents, or hold an online meeting. In the educational aspect, Ms Teams is one of the digital platform alternatives which support the 4C (critical thinking, creativity, collaboration, and communication) application during the pandemic. This research aims to acknowledge the integration of 4C competencies using Ms Teams in English class and to know how it is applied. Through the descriptive qualitative methodology, this research employs observation and library studies during the teaching and learning process of Bahasa Inggris 1 and Bahasa Inggris 2 in two study programs in two semesters consecutively. The result shows that ____. It is suggested that _____. Keywords: 4C, Ms Teams, online learning, English language
Collocations are one of the problems faced by EFL (English as a Foreign Language) learners when learning English language. This study is intended to help the EFL Learners and non-native English speakers to add knowledge about collocations. Therefore, this study is aimed to find the use of lexical collocations and their meaning. This study used a descriptive qualitative research technique. The source of the data is eleven articles from eight sections in seventeen.com. om the research, there were 79 lexical collocations and they were classified as six out of seven types that Benson et al. (2010) proposed. The data showed that the most used type is L3 (adjective + noun) and the least used is L4 (noun + verb). The meaning of the lexical collocations was defined from the contexts.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.