Blount's epiphyseal stapling can be recommended as a safe procedure with predictably good results in idiopathic angular deformities of the leg and leg length difference caused by overgrowth.
Treatment of slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) is still controversial. Agreement has not yet been reached on the appropriate time to perform surgery, the necessity of repositioning manoeuvres, the type of implants for stabilisation, or the need for prophylactic treatment of the contralateral side. In this retrospective study, we present 29 patients with unstable (acute and acute-on-chronic) SCFE treated by internal fixation of the epiphysis with three or four Kirschner wires both therapeutically on the affected side and prophylactically on the not (yet) affected side. After hardware removal and mean follow-up of 3.5 years, radiological and clinical examination of hip function was carried out. X-ray in two planes showed no incidence of any slip progression. Applying the score used by Heyman and Herndon, 18 results (62.1%) were classified as excellent, nine (31.1%) as good, one (3.4%) as fair, and one (3.4%) as poor. The rate of severe complications such as chondrolysis and avascular necrosis of the femoral head was low in our series (0% and 6.8%, respectively). This form of therapeutic management shows good clinical results with low complication rates. The slip can be efficiently stabilised, progression is reliably prevented, and remodelling of the joint gives the patient good overall hip function. We see no indication for emergency surgery.
Treatment of slipped capital femoral epiphysis is still controversial with regard to the implants used for stabilization and the need for prophylactic treatment of the contralateral, unaffected, side. The objective of this study was to ascertain whether prophylactic transfixation of the epiphysis with Kirschner wires in patients with unstable slipped capital femoral epiphysis resulted in significant disturbance of the growth plate and impairment of further growth of the femoral neck and head. Between 1990 and 1999, 29 patients with unstable slipped capital femoral epiphysis were simultaneously treated with internal fixation of the epiphysis and metaphysis with 3-4 Kirschner wires on the affected and the not (yet) affected side. After a mean follow-up of 3.5 years, we evaluated the hip joints radiologically, analysing different roentgenological parameters (CCD angle, femoral head diameter, length of the femoral neck and sphericity of the femoral head). CCD angle, femoral head diameter and length of the femoral neck showed statistically significant (P<0.001, Student's t-test) differences between the affected and unaffected, but prophylactically pinned, sides. Asphericity of the femoral head was found in six cases only on the affected side, whereas all hips, which were operated prophylactically, showed spherical femoral heads at follow-up (P<0.02, Pearson's chi test). These results indicate that the slip itself may cause impairment of the femoral growth plate in patients with unstable slipped capital femoral epiphysis and not stabilization with Kirschner wires. Compared with other series from the literature using different implants (screws, nails), prophylactic transfixation of the epiphysis and metaphysis with Kirschner wires is less compromising to the growth plate on the not (yet) affected side.
A lot of new implant devices for spine surgery are coming onto the market, in which vertebral screws play a fundamental role. The new screws developed for surgery of spine deformities have to be compared to established systems. A biomechanical in vitro study was designed to assess the bone-screw interface fixation strength of seven different screws used for correction of scoliosis in spine surgery. The objectives of the current study were twofold: (1) to evaluate the initial strength at the bone-screw interface of newly developed vertebral screws (Universal Spine System II) compared to established systems (product comparison) and (2) to evaluate the influence of screw design, screw diameter, screw length and bone mineral density on pullout strength. Fifty-six calf vertebral bodies were instrumented with seven different screws (USS II anterior 8.0 mm, USS II posterior 6.2 mm, KASS 6.25 mm, USS II anterior 6.2 mm, USS II posterior 5.2 mm, USS 6.0 mm, USS 5.0 mm). Bone mineral density (BMD) was determined by quantitative computed tomography (QCT). Failure in axial pullout was tested using a displacement-controlled universal test machine. USS II anterior 8.0 mm showed higher pullout strength than all other screws. The difference constituted a tendency (P = 0.108) when compared to USS II posterior 6.2 mm (+19%) and was significant in comparison to the other screws (+30 to +55%, P < 0.002). USS II posterior 6.2 mm showed significantly higher pullout strength than USS 5.0 mm (+30%, P = 0.014). The other screws did not differ significantly in pullout strength. Pullout strength correlated significantly with BMD (P = 0.0015) and vertebral body width/screw length (P < 0.001). The newly developed screws for spine surgery (USS II) show higher pullout strength when compared to established systems. Screw design had no significant influence on pullout force in vertebral body screws, but outer diameter of the screw, screw length and BMD are good predictors of pullout resistance.
In view of the number of inadequate reductions in plaster casts, we recommend verifying the position of the hip joint by MRI. This MRI documentation should be established as a standard examination post-reduction.
There is a broad and controversial discussion about the surgical procedure and the type of hardware for internal transfixation of the epiphysis and metaphysis in slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE). Prophylactic pinning is even more controversial. One hundred and nine patients showing SCFE underwent a one-stage bilateral fixation of the epiphysis with three or four Kirschner wires (pins). From these 109 patients (69 male and 40 female), 94 had an unilateral slip and were operated prophylactically on the contralateral side. There were no complications such as avascular necrosis of the femoral head, chondrolysis, bone fracture, failure of metal implant, osteomyelitis or deep wound infection either at the time of surgery or at the minimum follow-up of 1 year with prophylactic pinning in SCFE. Therefore, we consider pinning allows for efficient stabilization, reliably preventing any progression of SCFE on the affected side and, furthermore, prevents the incidence of a secondary slip on the primarily nondisplaced contralateral side. The transfixation of epiphysis and metaphysis with Kirschner wires (pins) shows good subjective and objective long-term results compared with other surgical methods and implants. There is only a low morbidity rate with this method, because reoperations may only become necessary in the younger age group owing to normal growth of the femoral neck, compared with a high benefit from prophylactic surgical treatment of the nonaffected opposite side at the time of unilateral onset of the disease. The pins may no longer catch the epiphysis but further growth will allow for remodeling of the femoral head and for an optimal neck/shaft ratio. In case of further growth and relative shortening of the pins, refixation may become necessary. Therefore, we like to recommend the Kirschner-wire transfixation (pinning) of the epiphysis and metaphysis in patients with SCFE for primary treatment of SCFE as well as for prophylactic pinning of the contralateral side in one sitting.
Intramuscular botulinum toxin A injections are beneficial for the treatment of functional shortening of the iliopsoas muscle, but it is difficult to achieve precise needle positioning and injection. As a solution to this we present an ultrasound-guided injection technique for the iliopsoas muscle using an anterior approach from the groin. The procedure was performed 26 times in 13 patients (seven males, six females; mean age 11 years, SD 9 years 8 months; age range 4 to 31 years), 10 times bilaterally. Indications were functional iliopsoas shortening due to cerebral palsy (17 hips), hereditary spastic paraplegia (four hips), and Perthes disease (five hips). In all cases the iliopsoas muscle was identified easily by ultrasound; the placement of the injection needle and injection into the site of interest were observed during real time. No complications were encountered. Botulinum toxin A (BTX-A) injections have become established as a standard procedure for the treatment of functional shortening of different muscles in persons with spasticity or dystonia (Kessler et al. 1999, Bakheit et al. 2001, Kirschner et al. 2001). Optimal needle placement is essential to avoid severe side effects and to assess lack of response to the drug or incorrect region of injection. While injection into superficial, very palpable muscles is quite easy, the approach to other muscles such as the iliopsoas muscle may be more difficult and the placement of the needle for an optimal injection site is harder to control. As a solution to this, we present an ultrasound-guided injection technique. The main indications for BTX-A injections in the iliopsoas muscle are dynamic hip flexion deformities mostly due to spastic conditions which may compromise walking (increased anterior pelvic tilt during the whole gait cycle, decreased hip extension at terminal stance, increased peak hip flexion during swing; Molenaers et al. 1999. Another indication might be decentration of the femoral head (as part of an injection programme which also includes other muscles like the adductors and the medial hamstrings) for pain relief, reducing care difficulties and, possibly, prevention of further decentration (Porta 2000, Foster et al. 2001, Deleplanque et al. 2002, Lubik et al. 2002). In Perthes disease, BTX-A injections in the iliopsoas muscle and the adductors may prevent a fixed deformity, which is a negative prognostic factor.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
334 Leonard St
Brooklyn, NY 11211
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.