2006
DOI: 10.1097/01202412-200609000-00005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiological evaluation of unstable (acute) slipped capital femoral epiphysis treated by pinning with Kirschner wires

Abstract: Treatment of slipped capital femoral epiphysis is still controversial with regard to the implants used for stabilization and the need for prophylactic treatment of the contralateral, unaffected, side. The objective of this study was to ascertain whether prophylactic transfixation of the epiphysis with Kirschner wires in patients with unstable slipped capital femoral epiphysis resulted in significant disturbance of the growth plate and impairment of further growth of the femoral neck and head. Between 1990 and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
24
1
8

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
24
1
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore the development of efficient treatment strategies based upon a reliable evaluation tool is mandatory. Up to now outcome studies have evaluated only subjective, clinical and radiological parameters [13][14][15]. Functional aspects and especially the influence on gait have been commonly neglected.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore the development of efficient treatment strategies based upon a reliable evaluation tool is mandatory. Up to now outcome studies have evaluated only subjective, clinical and radiological parameters [13][14][15]. Functional aspects and especially the influence on gait have been commonly neglected.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Potential mechanisms for the development of osteonecrosis may be partially dependent on the type of treatment but include kinking of periosteal blood vessels resulting from torsional deformity, synovitis associated with the trauma, vascular tamponade resulting from intracapsular hematoma, timing of treatment, and location of fixation devices within the epiphysis. Multiple treatment algorithms that were developed to address these theoretical causes include intentional delay in treatment [11], preoperative traction [13,19,20], both open and closed urgent reduction and fixation [8,17], and open or percutaneous capsulotomy [8,12,19] and are all associated with developing osteonecrosis. Patients with unstable SCFE often presented with substantially more deformity, often correctable, and were more likely to undergo attempted reduction, either intentional or inadvertent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Auch ein weiteres Wachstum der Hüfte wird durch die KirschnerDrähte nicht wesentlich behindert. Hierdurch ist ein Remodeling des Hüftkopfes durch das weitere Wachstum möglich [1,32]. Der Nachteil der KirschnerDrähte liegt in der Tatsache, dass sie im Verlauf dislozieren oder den Gelenkspalt perforieren können und somit letztlich ihre Haltefunktion verlieren und neu platziert werden müssen.…”
Section: Tab 2 Darstellungderepiphyen-diaphysen(ed)undcentrum-collumunclassified
“…Somit ist in unserer Untersuchung die Revisionsrate geringer als bei der Verwendung von Kirschner-Drähten, bei denen schon die Rate für Reoperationen aufgrund des Herauswanderns der Drähte bei ca. 27 % liegt [32]. In der Untersuchung der dynamischen Gleitschrauben von Hackenbroch wurden wenige Komplikationen berichtet [10].…”
Section: Tab 2 Darstellungderepiphyen-diaphysen(ed)undcentrum-collumunclassified