Is the field of cognitive aging irretrievably concerned with decline and deficits, or is it shifting to emphasize the hope of preservation and enhancement of cognitive function in late life? A fragment of an answer comes from research attempting to understand the reasons for individual variability in the extent and rate of cognitive decline. This body of work has created a sense of optimism based on evidence that there are some health behaviors that amplify cognitive performance or mitigate the rate of age-related cognitive decline. In this context, we discuss the role of physical activity on neurocognitive function in late adulthood and summarize how it can be conceptualized as a constructive approach both for the maintenance of cognitive function and as a therapeutic for enhancing or optimizing cognitive function in late life. In this way, physical activity research can be used to shape perceptions of cognitive aging. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, Volume 18 is May 2022. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/page/journal/pubdates for revised estimates.
Introduction The current study investigated the association between objectively measured physical activity and cognition in older adults over approximately 8 years. Methods We utilized data from 199 cognitively unimpaired individuals from the Australian Imaging, Biomarkers and Lifestyle (AIBL) study, aged ≥60. Actigraphy was used to measure physical activity (intensity, total activity, and energy expenditure) at baseline. Cognition was assessed using a comprehensive cognitive battery every 18‐months. Results Higher baseline energy expenditure predicted better episodic recall memory and global cognition over the follow‐up period (p = 0.031; p = 0.047, respectively). Those with higher physical activity intensity and greater total activity also had better global cognition over time (both p = 0.005). Finally, higher total physical activity predicted improved episodic recall memory over time (p = 0.022). Discussion These results suggest that physical activity can preserve cognition and that activity intensity may play an important role in this association. Highlights Greater total physical activity predicts preserved episodic memory and global cognition. Moderate intensity physical activity (>3.7 metabolic equivalents of task [MET]) predicts preserved global cognition. Expending > 373 kilocalories per day may benefit episodic memory and global cognition.
Background Wide evidence suggests that physical activity (PA) confers protection against Alzheimer’s disease (AD). On the other hand, the apolipoprotein E gene (APOE) ε4 allele represents the greatest genetic risk factor for developing AD. Extensive research has been conducted to determine whether frequent PA can mitigate the increased AD risk associated with APOE ε4. However, thus far, these attempts have produced inconclusive results. In this context, one possible explanation could be that the influence of the combined effect of PA and APOE ε4 carriage might be dependent on the specific outcome measure utilised. Main body. In order to bridge these discrepancies, the aim of this theoretical article is to propose a novel model on the interactive effects of PA and APOE ε4 carriage on well-established mechanisms underlying AD. Available literature was searched to investigate how PA and APOE ε4 carriage, independently and in combination, may alter several molecular pathways involved in AD pathogenesis. The reviewed mechanisms include amyloid beta (Aβ) and tau deposition and clearance, neuronal resilience and neurogenesis, lipid function and cerebrovascular alterations, brain immune response and glucose metabolism. Finally, combining all this information, we have built an integrative model, which includes evidence-based and theoretical synergistic interactions across mechanisms. Moreover, we have identified key knowledge gaps in the literature, providing a list of testable hypotheses that future studies need to address. Conclusions We conclude that PA influences a wide array of molecular targets involved in AD neuropathology. A deeper understanding of where, when and, most importantly, how PA decreases AD risk even in the presence of the APOE ε4 allele will enable the creation of new protocols using exercise along pharmaceuticals in combined therapeutic approaches.
Background: Wide evidence suggests that physical activity (PA) confers protection against Alzheimer’s disease (AD). On the other hand, the Apolipoprotein E gene (APOE) ε4 allele represents the greatest genetic risk factor for developing AD. Extensive research has been conducted to determine whether frequent PA can mitigate the increased AD risk associated with APOE ε4. However, thus far these attempts have produced inconclusive results. In this context, one possible explanation could be that the influence of the combined effect of PA and APOE ε4 carriage might be dependent on the specific outcome measure utilized.Main body: In order to bridge these discrepancies, the aim of this theoretical article is to propose a novel model on the interactive effects of PA and APOE ε4 carriage on well-established mechanisms underlying AD. Available literature was searched to investigate how PA and APOE ε4 carriage, independently and in combination, may alter several molecular pathways involved in AD pathogenesis. The reviewed mechanisms include amyloid beta (Aβ) and tau deposition and clearance, neuronal resilience and neurogenesis, lipid function and cerebrovascular alterations, brain immune response and glucose metabolism. Finally, combining all this information we have built an integrative model, which includes evidence-based and theoretical synergistic interactions across mechanisms. Moreover, we have identified key knowledge gaps in the literature, providing a list of testable hypotheses that future studies need to address. Conclusions: We conclude that PA influences a wide array of molecular targets involved in AD neuropathology. A deeper understanding of where, when and, most importantly, how PA decreases AD risk even in the presence of the APOE ε4 allele will enable the creation of new protocols using exercise along pharmaceuticals in combined therapeutic approaches.
Background Lifestyle factors such as sleep and physical activity influence risk of cognitive decline and dementia. Higher habitual physical activity and optimal sleep are associated with better cognitive function and lower levels of Alzheimer’s disease biomarkers, including beta‐amyloid (Aß). There is currently a poor understanding of how physical activity may influence the relationship between sleep and cognition, and whether exercise and sleep interact to influence cognition and Aß. Developing this understanding is crucial for creating effective lifestyle interventions for dementia prevention. Method Data from the Australian Imaging, Biomarkers and Lifestyle (AIBL) study were utilised to determine whether self‐reported physical activity moderates the cross‐sectional relationship between self‐reported sleep parameters (duration, efficiency, latency, disturbance, quality), cognitive function (episodic memory, attention and processing speed, executive function), and brain Aß (quantified by amyloid positron emission tomography, using the Centiloid scale). Analyses were adjusted for age, sex, APOE ε4 carriage, mood, premorbid intelligence, and collection point. Participants were 404 community‐dwelling cognitively normal older adults aged 60 and above (75.3 5.7 years). Data from a subset of participants (n = 220, aged 75.2 5.6 years) were used for analyses with AB as the outcome. Result Physical activity moderated the relationship between sleep duration and episodic memory (ß = ‐.09, SE = .03, p = .005), and sleep efficiency and episodic memory (ß = ‐.08, SE = .03, p = .016). Physical activity moderated the relationship between sleep duration and A® (ß = ‐.12, SE = .06, p = .036), and sleep quality and Aß (ß = .12, SE = .06, p = .029). Conclusion Physical activity may play an important role in the relationship between sleep and cognitive function, and sleep and brain Aß. Future longitudinal and intervention studies in this area are crucial for informing interventions for dementia prevention.
BackgroundEvidence suggests that physical activity (PA) confers protection against Alzheimer’s disease (AD), while the Apolipoprotein E (APOE) ε4 allele represents the greatest genetic risk factor. Extensive research has thus far failed to establish whether frequent PA can mitigate the increased AD risk associated with APOE ε4. Studies looking at various AD‐related traits (e.g., amyloid beta burden or cortical atrophy) might show diverse results because the biological pathways involved are differentially influenced by PA, APOE ε4 carriage and their interaction. In order to bridge these discrepancies, the aim of this theoretical article is to propose a novel model of how PA and APOE ε4 carriage, independently and in combination, may alter well‐established molecular mechanisms underlying AD pathogenesis.MethodAvailable literature was searched to investigate how PA and APOE ε4 carriage, independently and in combination, may alter several molecular pathways involved in AD pathogenesis. The reviewed mechanisms include amyloid beta (Aβ) and tau deposition and clearance, neuronal resilience and neurogenesis, lipid function and cerebrovascular alterations, brain immune response, and glucose metabolism.ResultWe have identified potential pathways through which the beneficial effects of PA might offset some of the detrimental outcomes of APOE ε4 carriage. Nonetheless, PA does not seem to be able to entirely prevent or revert the noxious effects of genetic risk. Our integrative model includes evidence‐based and theoretical synergistic interactions across mechanisms, and a proposal of testable hypotheses for future studies.ConclusionPA influences a wide array of molecular targets involved in AD neuropathology. A better understanding of where, when and most importantly, how, PA decreases AD risk in the presence of the APOE ε4 allele is essential to formulate combined therapeutic approaches.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.