No abstract

Abnormalities of haemorheology (plasma viscosity, fibrinogen), endothelial function [von Willebrand factor (vWf)], platelet activation (soluble P-selectin) and thrombogenesis [plasminogen activator inhibitor (PAI), and fibrin D-dimer] are common in cardiovascular disease. We investigated changes in these markers in 86 patients (58 males) presenting with acute stroke (all age < 75 years, with ictus < 12 h), and sequential changes at six time points (baseline on admission, 48 h, 1 week, 2 weeks, 3 months and 6 months following the onset of stroke). Baseline plasma viscosity, haematocrit, fibrinogen, vWf, PAI, soluble P-selectin and fibrin D-dimer levels were increased in the acute stroke patients compared with 35 age-matched and sex-matched controls. Following admission, there were significant increases in haematocrit at 2 weeks, vWf at 48 h and 1 week, fibrinogen at 1 week, PAI at 48 h and 1 and 2 weeks, soluble P-selectin at 48 h, and fibrin D-dimer at 48 h and 1 week following admission. Using univariate 'time to event' analysis, high (> median) mean age (log-rank test, P = 0.0262), diastolic blood pressure (P = 0.01), haematocrit (P = 0.0234), PAI-1 (P = 0.0066) and fibrin D-dimer levels (P = 0.0356) were associated with a shortened event-free survival. Using a multivariate Cox survival analysis, only PAI-1 levels remained an independent predictor of survival (P = 0.0349). We conclude that acute stroke patients have marked baseline abnormalities of haemorheology, endothelial disturbance, thrombogenesis, platelet activation and abnormal fibrinolysis, with further changes over the subsequent follow-up period. Abnormal thrombogenesis and fibrinolysis may significantly influence survival in patients with acute stroke. These changes may have potential implications for the pathogenesis of stroke and its complications, although the possibility remains that we are documenting an acute phase response that previous studies, which included stroke patients with a wide time range since ictus onset, have neglected to consider.

Patients with AF have increased intravascular thrombogenesis and platelet activation compared with patients in sinus rhythm. Introduction of ultra-low-dose warfarin (1 mg) or aspirin 300 mg does not significantly alter these markers, although conventional warfarin therapy reduces beta-TG and fibrin D-dimer levels. This is consistent with the beneficial effect of full-dose warfarin in preventing stroke and thromboembolism in AF and suggests that ultra-low-dose warfarin and aspirin may not exert similar beneficial effects.

Objective-To investigate variations in the management of patients with atrial fibrillation among consultant physicians. Design-Questionnaire survey. Subjects-Consultant physicians in England, Wales, and Scotland. Results-214 consultant physicians (88 cardiologists and 126 non-cardiologists) were surveyed between May and July 1994. Most physicians (47.7%) reported that they saw one to five patients with atrial fibrillation weekly. Some 52% of cardiologists and 40% of non-cardiologists considered that the main factor influencing their decision of whether or not to anticoagulate was the clinical history--that is, heart failure, valve disease, or stroke.When encountering a patient admitted acutely with new onset atrial fibrillation, significantly more cardiologists (66% v 52%, x2 = 6-89, P = 0.03) would inmnediately start anticoagulant treatment, most favouring intravenous heparin. Most physicians would also introduce antiarrhythmic treatment or digoxin, but more cardiologists would attempt immediate pharmacological (39% v 18% of non-cardiologists, P < 0.001) or later electrical (86% v 69%, x2 = 11-75 P = 0.003) cardioversion to sinus rhythm, while noncardiologists tended to prefer "rate control" with digoxin. Although many physicians would not continue antiarrhythmic treatment post-cardioversion, more cardiologists than non-cardiologists would do so (the commonest choice being class III agents) (31% v 17%, P = 0.04).Fewer non-cardiologists would continue anticoagulant treatment post-cardioversion (27% v 69% of cardiologists, X2 = 39-85 P < 0.0001). When treating patients with atrial fibrillation, decisions about anticoagulation were usually related to the perceived relative risk of thromboembolism versus haemorrhage derived for each of six case management scenarios in the questionnaire. There was, however, general agreement between cardiologists and non-cardiologists in the use of antithrombotic treatment in the management of lone atrial fibrillation, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, and patients with atrial fibrillation and mitral valve disease or thyrotoxicosis.Conclusion-There is considerable variation in the management of atrial fibrillation, with more cardiologists than non-cardiologists considering cardioversion to sinus rhythm (and the use of antiarrhythmic and anticoagulant treatment post-cardioversion) and thromboprophylaxis with anticoagulation. Guidelines on the management of this common arrhythmia are clearly required.

No abstract

Dysglycemia, in this survey defined as impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) or type 2 diabetes, is common in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and associated with an unfavorable prognosis. This European survey investigated dysglycemia screening and risk factor management of patients with CAD in relation to standards of European guidelines for cardiovascular subjects. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS The European Society of Cardiology's European Observational Research Programme (ESC EORP) European Action on Secondary and Primary Prevention by Intervention to Reduce Events (EUROASPIRE) V (2016-2017) included 8,261 CAD patients, aged 18-80 years, from 27 countries. If the glycemic state was unknown, patients underwent an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and measurement of glycated hemoglobin A 1c. Lifestyle, risk factors, and pharmacological management were investigated. RESULTS A total of 2,452 patients (29.7%) had known diabetes. OGTT was performed in 4,440 patients with unknown glycemic state, of whom 41.1% were dysglycemic. Without the OGTT, 30% of patients with type 2 diabetes and 70% of those with IGT would not have been detected. The presence of dysglycemia almost doubled from that selfreported to the true proportion after screening. Only approximately one-third of all coronary patients had completely normal glucose metabolism. Of patients with known diabetes, 31% had been advised to attend a diabetes clinic, and only 24% attended. Only 58% of dysglycemic patients were prescribed all cardioprotective drugs, and use of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (3%) or glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (1%) was small. CONCLUSIONS Urgent action is required for both screening and management of patients with CAD and dysglycemia, in the expectation of a substantial reduction in risk of further cardiovascular events and in complications of diabetes, as well as longer life expectancy.

No abstract

No abstract