1996
DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(96)00293-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring in Atrial Fibrillation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

6
32
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
6
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…153 However prolonged (2 to 24 hours) ambulatory observations do provide data similar to that in subjects with normal cardiac rhythm. 154,155 Sometimes, an intra-arterial blood pressure is necessary to get a baseline for comparison. If severe regular bradycardia is present (eg, 40 to 50 bpm), deflation should be slower than usual to prevent underestimation of systolic and overestimation of diastolic blood pressure.…”
Section: Arrhythmiasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…153 However prolonged (2 to 24 hours) ambulatory observations do provide data similar to that in subjects with normal cardiac rhythm. 154,155 Sometimes, an intra-arterial blood pressure is necessary to get a baseline for comparison. If severe regular bradycardia is present (eg, 40 to 50 bpm), deflation should be slower than usual to prevent underestimation of systolic and overestimation of diastolic blood pressure.…”
Section: Arrhythmiasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, few studies of hypertension and coexisting AF using ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) have been reported. 16,17 In many patients with AF, it is difficult to obtain accurate BP measurements. 18 In the present study, therefore, the BP measurements were performed by ABPM and home BP in hypertensive patients with paroxysmal AF who were in normal sinus rhythm ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT01748253.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a separate study, the clinical use of the SpaceLabs 90207 oscillometric ABPM device in outpatients with chronic AF was reported to be satisfactory, when used to assess blood pressure in stable outpatients with chronic AF. 19 So, is it goodbye mercury? Despite these data, the sceptics still insist that automated blood pressure monitoring should be used with caution in AF, as many automated machines are unable to generate reproducible and/or reliable readings with this arrhythmia.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%