Consent is one of the most powerful concepts known to the law; in particular, it can provide a defence in the criminal context by converting unlawful conduct to that which is not only lawful but even to be encouraged. Despite this, the task of formulating a general theory of consent in criminal law has not been an easy one, not least because of the different situations in which it operates. Given that consent fundamentally involves the subjective attitude of the person concerned to the conduct in question, this paper sets out to explore the dynamics of consent by considering a number of factors, including the way in which it operates as a defence to different crimes, the problems to which consent gives rise in the criminal context and the emotional factors which can influence someone to grant it. It is argued that the development of the law both from a theoretical and a practical perspective requires a more informed and nuanced concept of consent in terms of the emotional dynamics involved.We live in an age that is well aware of the value and significance of emotion in everyday life. Whereas in the past emotions were often seen as no more than primitive passions-unruly horses, that needed to be kept under control by the reins of reason 1 -modern scholarship on emotions not only insists that they serve important functions, especially in our social lives, 2 but also rejects the very notion of a bright line between emotion and reason. 3 At a more popular level, works on emotional intelligence and emotional
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.