2007
DOI: 10.4324/9780203944912
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Literacy Game

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the ERA set a new tone in education reform, gains in student outcomes in England were more evident after the adoption of these strategies than they were from the original ERA reforms (Stannard and Huxford, 2007).…”
Section: Conclusion-beyond the Eramentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although the ERA set a new tone in education reform, gains in student outcomes in England were more evident after the adoption of these strategies than they were from the original ERA reforms (Stannard and Huxford, 2007).…”
Section: Conclusion-beyond the Eramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our theory of action says that nothing lasting will happen unless people develop new capaci-ties. At the same time, new capacities build motivation because they generate clarity, skills and success (Stannard and Huxford, 2007).…”
Section: Capacity Buildingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In England, another diagrammatic summary became similarly influential, the so-called 'searchlights' model that was used in the non-statutory Framework for Teaching in the National Literacy Strategy (Stannard and Huxford 2007). The four sources of 'knowledge' from the national curriculum (phonic, grammatical, context and graphic, including word recognition), were displayed at the four points of the compass around a circle that represents the text.…”
Section: Summarising the Reading Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is not because the government ignored or overlooked research evidence as it introduced the Numeracy and Literacy Strategies. It is certainly possible to defend the selection it made (Beard, 1999; Stannard and Huxford, 2007). But rather it is precisely because government appropriated to itself the task of selecting from that research base, determining how that evidence should be used, and then tried to adapt its starting point as evidence of ‘impact’ came back from the performance data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%