No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

BACKGROUND The efficiency of RNA interference (RNAi) varies considerably among different insect species, and there is growing evidence to suggest that degradation of double‐stranded (dsRNA) prior to uptake is an important factor that limits the efficiency of RNAi in insects. In Locusta migratoria, RNAi is highly efficient when dsRNA is delivered by injection, but not by feeding. However, detailed mechanisms causing such differential RNAi efficiency are still elusive. RESULTS We identified and characterized the full‐length complementary DNAs (cDNAs) of two new dsRNA nuclease (dsRNase) genes from L. migratoria, which were named LmdsRNase1 and LmdsRNase4. Transcript analyses revealed that LmdsRNase1 and LmdsRNase4 were highly expressed in hemolymph with relatively lower expression in other tested tissues. Our study using heterologously expressed LmdsRNase1 and LmdsRNase4 fusion proteins showed that LmdsRNase1 can degrade dsRNA rapidly at an optimal pH of 5, whereas LmdsRNase4 had no activity at any of the pH values examined. In comparing the substrate specificity of the four LmdsRNases, we found that only LmdsRNase1 and LmdsRNase2 digested dsRNA; however, our experiments suggested that the physiological pH of hemolymph (7.0) suppresses LmdsRNase1 activity permitting significant dsRNA stability in this tissue. Conversely, the physiological pH of midgut juice (6.8) is ideal for LmdsRNase2 activity, resulting in degradation of dsRNA in midgut. CONCLUSION The physiological pH of different insect tissues or compartments can significantly alter the stability of dsRNA by influencing LmdsRNase activity in L. migratoria. Thus, new strategies to overcome such obstacles are expected to help implement RNAi‐based technologies for insect pest management. © 2018 Society of Chemical Industry

No abstract

Nutritional and medicinal benefits have been attributed to the consumption of tissues from the black-boned chickens in oriental countries. Lueyang black-boned chicken is one of the native chicken breeds. However, some birds may instead have white or lighter skin, which directly causes economic losses every year. Previous studies of pigmentation have focused on a number of genes that may play important roles in coat color regulation. Illumina2000 sequencing technology was used to catalog the global gene expression profiles in the skin of the Lueyang chicken with white versus black skin. A total of 18,608 unigenes were assembled from the reads obtained from the skin of the white and black chickens. A total of 649 known genes were differentially expressed in the black versus white chickens, with 314 genes that were up regulated and 335 genes that were down-regulated, and a total of 162 novel genes were differentially expressed in the black versus white chickens, consisting of 73 genes that were up-regulated (including 4 highly expressed genes that were expressed exclusively in the skin of the black chickens) and 89 genes that were down-regulated. There were also a total of 8 known coat-color genes expressed in previous studies (ASIP, TYR, KIT, TYRP1, OCA2, KITLG, MITF and MC1R). In this study, 4 of which showed greater expression in the black chickens, and several were up-regulated, such as KIT, ASIP, TYR and OCA2. To our surprise, KITLG, MITF and MC1R showed no significant difference in expression between the black- and white-skinned chickens, and the expression of TYRP1 was not detected in either skin color. The expression of ASIP, TYR, KIT, TYRP1, OCA2, KITLG, MITF and MC1R was validated by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR), and the results of the qPCR were consistent with the RNA-seq. This study provides several candidate genes that may be associated with the development of black versus white skin. More importantly, the fact that the MC1R gene showed no significant difference in expression between the black and white chickens is of particular interest for future studies that aim to elucidate its functional role in the regulation of skin color.