No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

In two-stage orthopaedic revision surgery, high local levels of antibiotics are achieved after removal of an infected prosthesis through temporary implantation of gentamicin-loaded beads. However, despite their antibiotic release, these beads act as a biomaterial surface to which bacteria preferentially adhere, grow and potentially develop antibiotic resistance. Gentamicin-loaded beads were retrieved from 20 patients with prosthesis-related infections. Excised tissue samples were taken for routine culture, while beads were analysed in an extensive laboratory procedure. Extensive culture procedures indicated the presence of bacteria on gentamicin-loaded beads in 18 of the 20 patients involved, while 12 of these 18 patients were considered free of infection by routine culture. Nineteen of 28 bacterial strains isolated were gentamicin resistant and cultures from three patients yielded highly gentamicin-resistant sub-populations. It is concluded that routine culture of excised tissues in orthopaedic revision surgery is inadequate to ascertain full eradication of infection, especially as infecting, antibiotic-resistant bacteria preferentially adhere to and grow on gentamicin-loaded beads. Extensive examination of the bead surfaces is proposed as a more reliable indication that infection has been eradicated.

Biomaterial-associated infection of orthopaedic joint replacements is the second most common cause of implant failure. Yet, the microbiologic detection rate of infection is relatively low, probably because routine hospital cultures are made only of swabs or small pieces of excised tissue and not of the surfaces of potentially infected implants. Joint replacements from patients in whom infection was suspected, after clinical, radiologic, and biochemical examinations, were used in this study. The aim of the current study was to compare the detection rate of infection in total joint replacements based on cultures of the excised tissue and scrapings from the biomaterial surface. Joint prostheses were retrieved from 22 patients requiring orthopaedic revision surgery because of suspected infection of their prostheses. Routine hospital culturing of tissue only showed bacterial growth in nine patients (41%). However, after prolonged culturing, bacterial growth was observed in 14 patients (64%), whereas extensive culturing of scrapings from the biomaterial surface indicated bacterial growth in 19 of the 22 patients (86%). In addition, confocal laser scanning microscopy enabled observation of biofilm bacteria on the surfaces of the explanted prostheses. Diagnosis in orthopaedic revision surgery should consider using a microbial or microscopic analysis of the surface of an explanted prosthesis, where the biofilm mode of growth firmly anchors and protects the infecting organisms. Improved detection of infection by analysis of the implant surface is expected to yield ameliorated therapy and a reduced need for revision surgery.

No abstract

Objective To increase our understanding of factors underlying the decision to store gametes after the diagnosis of cancer.Design Qualitative interview study.Setting Andrology, Haematology, and Oncology Departments of a Scottish teaching hospital, and patients' own homes.Population Sixteen men and 18 women aged 17-49 years recently diagnosed with cancer; 15 health professionals concerned in cancer care.Methods Audio-recorded semi-structured interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed thematically. Topics included perceptions of diagnosis; prognosis; future reproductive choices; priorities; quality of information received; communication and decisions made about future reproductive choices; and the role of partners, family, friends and healthcare professionals. Professional interviews examined their role in decision making and that of protocols and guidelines, together with information emerging from patient interview analysis. Main outcome measure Themes identified following analysis of interview transcripts.Results The primary barriers to pursuing fertility preservation were the way in which information was provided and the 'urgent need for treatment' conveyed by staff. Survival was always viewed as paramount, with future fertility secondary. Sperm banking was viewed as 'part and parcel' of oncology care, and the majority of men quickly stored sperm as 'insurance' against future infertility. Few women were afforded the opportunity to discuss their options, reflecting clinicians' reservations about the experimental nature of egg and ovarian tissue cryopreservation, and the need for partner involvement in embryo storage.Conclusions Significant gaps in the information provided to young women diagnosed with cancer suggest the need for an early appointment with a fertility expert.

No abstract