1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0142-9612(97)00041-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cytotoxic, allergic and genotoxic activity of a nickel-titanium alloy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
141
0
5

Year Published

1998
1998
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 336 publications
(153 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
7
141
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The corrosion causes the release of metals from the alloys used for their manufacture. In this context, some studies have shown that contact of orthodontic appliances with the oral mucosa is unable to cause cytotoxicity or genotoxicity [28][29][30] . White patches and ulcerations reflect extensive tissue injury upon orthodontic treatment.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The corrosion causes the release of metals from the alloys used for their manufacture. In this context, some studies have shown that contact of orthodontic appliances with the oral mucosa is unable to cause cytotoxicity or genotoxicity [28][29][30] . White patches and ulcerations reflect extensive tissue injury upon orthodontic treatment.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these biocompatibility experiments, conducted according to the regulations of the International Organization of Standardization (ISO), the shape-memory metal, nickel-titanium alloy provoked no cytotoxic, allergic or genotoxic responses [37]. An excellent implantation study was published by RyhĂ€nen et al [27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The transition temperature of the rod, i.e., the temperature at which low-temperature phase martensite changes to the high-temperature phase austenite, was 25°C. For the composition and surface treatment of the used shape-memory alloy, the reader is referred to the articles on corrosion and biocompatibility [37,38]. The rod had been stored in sterile conditions at -18°C.…”
Section: Surgical Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparative studies of biocompatibility between alloys 2 show that the solubilized nickel may present several adverse reactions. Despite the reports of some authors 3,4 of the lack of cytotoxicity of alloys, a study conducted by Fili 5 found that Ni-rich precipitates in NiTi osseous implants chemically passivized with HF, HNO 3 and H 2 O 300 days after implantation. A number of methodologies were proposed with the objective of creating a barrier that would block the release of nickel, resulting in an increased biocompatibility of the alloy and corrosion resistance: anodization 6,7 , heat treatments for superficial oxidation 8,9 , sputtering 10,11 , plasma electrolytic oxidation 12 , plasma immersion ion implantation 13 , hydroxiapatite/zirconia composite coating 14 , TiN coating 15 , sol-gel technology 16 metal vapor vaccum arc plasma source 17 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%