New spinal implants and surgical procedures are often tested pre-clinically on human cadaver spines. However, the availability of fresh frozen human cadaver material is very limited and alternative animal spines are more easily available in all desired age groups, and have more uniform geometrical and biomechanical properties. The porcine spine is said to be the most representative model for the human spine but a complete anatomical comparison is lacking. The goal of this descriptive study was to compare the anatomical dimensions of the cervical, thoracic, and lumbar vertebrae of the human and porcine spine in order to determine whether the porcine spine can be a representative model for the human spine. CT scans were made of 6 human and 6 porcine spines, and 16 anatomical dimensions were measured per individual vertebrae. Comparisons were made for the absolute values of the dimensions, for the patterns of the dimensions within four spinal regions, and normalised values of the dimensions within each individual vertebra. Similarities were found in vertebral body height, shape of the end-plates, shape of the spinal canal, and pedicle size. Furthermore, regional trends were comparable for all dimensions, except for spinal canal depth and spinous processus angle. The size of the end-plates increased more caudally in the human spine. Relating the dimensions to the size of the vertebral body, similarities were found in the size of the spinal canal, the transverse processus length, and size of the pedicles. Taking scaling differences into account, it is believed that the porcine spine can be a representative anatomical model for the human spine in specific research questions.

No abstract

No abstract

Percutaneous vertebroplasty has been performed for more than ten years to treat painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Clinical results have been encouraging, but little is known about the efficacy and safety of this minimally invasive procedure. We therefore performed a systematic review to assess the efficacy and safety of percutaneous vertebroplasty in osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. A search was conducted using Medline, Embase and The Cochrane Controlled Trials Register. The search yielded fifteen studies, eleven prospective, three retrospective and one controlled trial. Totally 1,136 interventions were performed on 793 patients. Mean pain scores, measured using a 0 to 10 VAS score, improved significantly from 7.8 to 3.1 (-60.3%) immediately after percutaneous vertebroplasty. The short-term complication rate varied between 0.4 and 75.6%. Leakage of cement outside the vertebral body was markedly common, ranging from 3.3 to 75.6%. Although the majority was asymptomatic, a few devastating clinical adverse effects were reported (mean 2.4%). Although percutaneous vertebroplasty is a widely accepted treatment for osteoporotic vertebral fractures, we revealed only a single controlled trial. We conclude that there are insufficient data available to reliably assess efficacy of percutaneous vertebroplasty. The procedure has a low rate of clinical complications, but potential complications can be devastating. In the future, assessing the efficacy of percutaneous vertebroplasty requires controlled trials with long-term follow-up.

The paraspinal muscles have been implicated as a major causative factor in the progression of idiopathic scoliosis. Therefore, the objectives of this preliminary study were to measure the electromyographic activity (EMG) of the paraspinal muscles to determine its relationship to progression of the scoliotic curve. Idiopathic scoliotic patients were selected and identified afterwards on curve progression. The EMG activity on both sides of the spine was measured in a set of standardized postures using bipolar surface electrodes at the apex and two end vertebrae of the scoliotic curve. An EMG ratio involving measurements of the EMG activity on the convex and concave sides of the scoliotic curve was used to evaluate the paraspinal muscles. Enhanced EMG ratios at the apex of the scoliotic curve were found in both groups during sitting and standing. The most interesting finding was that children with progression of the curve also showed enhanced EMG ratios at the lower end vertebra of the curve. The EMG ratios between the groups were significantly different from each other at the apex and end vertebrae for several test conditions. Overlap in the EMG-ratio ranges made differentiation difficult for prediction of the progression of the individual scoliosis patient. However, the EMG ratio at the lower end vertebra of the scoliotic curve is significantly higher than 1 in all test conditions in the group of children with subsequent progression of the curve, whereas it is always normal in the non-progressive group. Therefore, EMG of the paraspinal muscles might be of value for prediction of progression in idiopathic scoliosis.

Although analysis of scoliotic deformity is still studied extensively by means of conventional roentgenograms, computer-assisted digital analysis may allow a faster, more accurate and more complete evaluation of the scoliotic spine. In this study, a new computer-assisted measurement method was evaluated. This method uses digital reconstruction images for quantitative analysis of the scoliotic spine. The aim of the current study was to determine the reliability of the computer-assisted measuring method, which was done by establishing coefficients of repeatability for a variety of measurements. Measurements were carried out by five observers on 30 frontal and 10 lateral scoliotic digital reconstruction images. Each image was measured on three separate occasions by placing anatomical vertebral landmarks and drawing lines with a computer pointing device. The computer then calculated a number of geometrical shape parameters from scale calibration, landmarks and lines. The intra- and interobserver results were subjected to an analysis of variance to assess the level of agreement, and the means and standard deviations were calculated. The coefficient of repeatability (CR) was taken to be equal to two standard deviations. The mean intraobserver CR was found to be 3.1 degrees for the Cobb angle on the frontal digital image and 3.3 degrees for the kyphosis Cobb angle on the lateral overview. The mean difference in the intraobserver CR of the Cobb angle between measurements made by placing landmarks and those made by drawing lines was not statistically significant (P>0.05). The mean intraobserver CR for the other parameters can be summarized as follows: for lateral deviation it was 0.8 mm, for axial rotation 4.0 degrees and for length of the spine 3.3 mm. The interobserver bias was negligible. It can be concluded that the reliability of our new method for quantifying geometrical variables on digital reconstruction images is better than measurements on conventional roentgenograms in previously published reports. The presented method is therefore considered to be more accurate for research of spinal deformities and more adequate for clinical management of scoliosis.

The aetiology of idiopathic scoliosis: biomechanical and neuromuscular factors small curve develops due to a small defect in the neuromuscular control system and a second stage during adolescent growth in which the scoliotic curve is exacerbated by biomechanical factors.

STUDY DESIGN.: An in vitro study on human multilevel spinal segments. OBJECTIVE.: To determine the differences in biomechanical characteristics between 4 separate regions of the human spine and to provide quantitative information is derived on the range of motion (ROM), neutral zone (NZ), neutral zone stiffness (NZstiff), and flexibility (FLEX). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA.: Limited literature is available about the biomechanical behavior of different regions of the human spine, in particular with multilevel segments. Test setup en protocols were different between studies and therefore outcomes of separate regions are hardly comparable. METHODS.: A total of 24 spinal segments of 6 human cadaveric spines were prepared for biomechanical testing. Each specimen contained 4 vertebrae and 3 intervertebral discs: T1-T4, T5-T8, T9-T12, and L1-L4. Pure moments were applied to a maximum of 4 Nm in flexion/extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. Displacement of individual motion segments was measured using a 3-dimensional movement registration system. ROM, NZ, NZstiff, and FLEX of the spinal regions were calculated from the acquired load-displacement data. RESULTS.: In axial direction, ROM and NZ decreased and NZ stiffness increased from high to low vertebral levels. For flexion/extension and lateral flexion highest ROM and NZ and lowest NZ stiffness values were found at the T1-T4 and L1-L4 regions. NZ magnitudes and NZ stiffnesses were negatively correlated (P < 0.05). Flexibility of the spinal regions was variable; no significant differences were found between the 4 spinal regions. CONCLUSION.: This study showed the differences in ROM, NZ, and NZ stiffness between thoracolumbar regions of the human spine in axial rotation, flexion/extension, and lateral bending. Separate multilevel spinal segments were tested in 1 study, and therefore characteristics of different regions are truly comparable.