2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0142-9612(03)00554-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Backgrounds of antibiotic-loaded bone cement and prosthesis-related infection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
169
0
12

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 263 publications
(188 citation statements)
references
References 127 publications
2
169
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…The infection rate ranges between 0.5% and 3.0% after primary total hip arthroplasty despite strict antiseptic operative procedures, including systemic prophylaxis [1][2][3][4][5][6]. Infection rates between 5% and 35% have been described for endoprosthetic replacement of large bone defects after tumor resection [7][8][9][10][11][12], while external fixation produced infection in 2-30% of cases found during a literature review [13][14][15][16][17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The infection rate ranges between 0.5% and 3.0% after primary total hip arthroplasty despite strict antiseptic operative procedures, including systemic prophylaxis [1][2][3][4][5][6]. Infection rates between 5% and 35% have been described for endoprosthetic replacement of large bone defects after tumor resection [7][8][9][10][11][12], while external fixation produced infection in 2-30% of cases found during a literature review [13][14][15][16][17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All scale bars = 100µm DISCUSSION Both methods of testing show an increase in the fatigue life for Refobacin® Plus Bone Cement compared to Refobacin® Bone Cement and Refobacin Palacos® R. These are different formulation cements with Refobacin® Plus Bone Cement and Palamed® G having a higher powder-toliquid ratio and lower zirconium dioxide content than the other pair of cements ( Table 1). The antibiotic content is similar in the four cements and although these levels of antibiotic are clinically effective [23,24] they are not thought to significantly affect the mechanical properties of the cement [22,25]. Only the SSR specimens indicate an increase in the fatigue life for Palamed® G compared to Refobacin® Bone Cement R and Refobacin Palacos® R and no significant difference between Refobacin® Plus Bone Cement and Palamed® G. The Wöhler analysis using the MSC specimens shows an increase over all the stress levels for Refobacin® Plus Bone Cement compared to the Refobacin® Bone Cement R and Refobacin Palacos® R, with no substantial differences seen between the Palamed® G and the other two cements.…”
Section: Density Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…It is interesting that the addition of such substances to the bone recipe has been overlooked in the literature, even though many commercial bone recipe kits include co-polymers in their formulation (Hendriks et al, 2004). Comonomers may be added in small amount to the reaction medium in order to enhance the polymerization rates and the gel effect, thus accelerating the bone cement curing process.…”
Section: Verified That It Is Verymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, when initiator is added to the mixture, polymer chains that constitute the PMMA powder participate in the free radical polymerization reactions, forming entanglements with newly formed chains. This leads to an intimate chemical connection between the new and the previously formed PMMA chains (Hendriks et al, 2004). Since then, the term bone cement has been used to designate PMMA and methyl methacrylate (MMA) based mixtures (and mixtures with other acrylate compounds), prepared in the presence of initiators.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%