Understanding the mechanisms and key parameters controlling depletion-induced seismicity is key for seismic hazard analyses and the design of mitigation measures. In this paper a methodology is presented to model in 2D the static stress development on faults offsetting depleting reservoir compartments, reactivation of the fault, nucleation of seismic instability, and the subsequent fully dynamic rupture including seismic fault rupture and near-field wave propagation. Slip-dependent reduction of the fault's strength (cohesion and friction) was used to model the development of the instability and seismic rupture. The inclusion of the dynamic calculation allows for a closer comparison to field observables such as borehole seismic data compared to traditional static geomechanical models. We applied this model procedure to a fault and stratigraphy typical for the Groningen field, and compared the results for an offset fault to a fault without offset. A non-zero offset on the fault strongly influenced the stress distribution along the fault due to stress concentrations in the near-fault area close to the top of the hanging wall and the base of the footwall. The heterogeneous stress distribution not only controlled where nucleation occurred within the reservoir interval, but also influenced the subsequent propagation of seismic rupture with low stresses inhibiting the propagation of slip. In a reservoir without offset the stress distribution was relatively uniform throughout the reservoir depth interval. Reactivation occurred at a much larger pressure decrease, but the subsequent seismic event was much larger due to the more uniform state of stress within the reservoir. In both cases the models predicted a unidirectional downward-propagating rupture, with the largest wave amplitudes being radiated downwards into the hanging wall. This study showed how a realistic seismic event could be successfully modelled, including the depletion-induced stressing, nucleation, dynamic propagation, and wave propagation. The influence of fault offset on the depletion-induced stress is significant; the heterogeneous stress development along offset faults not only strongly controls the timing and location of a seismic slip, but also influences the subsequent rupture size of the dynamic event.

In the Netherlands, the bulk of the Miocene to lowest Pliocene sedimentary succession is currently assigned to a single lithostratigraphical unit, the Breda Formation. Although the formation was introduced over 40 years ago, the definition of its lower and upper boundaries is still problematic. Well-log correlations show that the improved lecto-stratotype for the Breda Formation in well Groote Heide partly overlaps with the additional reference section of the older Veldhoven Formation in the nearby well Broekhuizenvorst. The distinction between the Breda and the overlying Oosterhout Formation, which was mainly based on quantitative differences in glauconite and molluscs, gives rise to ongoing discussion, in particular due to the varying concentrations of glauconitic content that occur within both formations. In addition, the Breda Formation lacks a regional-scale stratigraphic framework which relates its various regionally to locally defined shallow marine to continental members. In order to resolve these issues, we performed renewed analyses of material from several archived cores. The results of archived and new dinocyst analyses were combined with lithological descriptions and wire-line log correlations of multiple wells, including the wells Groote Heide and Broekhuizenvorst. In this process, the updated dinocyst zonation of Munsterman & Brinkhuis (2004), recalibrated to the Geological Time Scale of Ogg et al. (2016), was used. To establish regionally consistent lithostratigraphic boundaries, additional data was used along a transect across the Roer Valley Graben running from its central part (well St-Michielsgestel-1) towards the southern rift shoulders (well Goirle-1). Along this transect, chronostratigraphic and lithostratigraphic analyses were integrated with well-log correlation and the analyses of seismic reflection data to constrain geometrical/structural relationships as well. The results led to the differentiation of two distinct seismic sequences distinguished by three recognisable unconformities: the Early Miocene Unconformity (EMU), the Mid-Miocene Unconformity (MMU) and the Late Miocene Unconformity (LMU). The major regional hiatus, referred to as the Mid-Miocene Unconformity, occurs intercalated within the present Breda Formation and compels subdivision of this unit into two formations, viz. the here newly established Groote Heide and the younger Diessen formations. Pending further studies, the former Breda Formation will be temporally raised in rank to the newly established Hilvarenbeek subgroup, which comprises both the Groote Heide and Diessen formations. Whereas these two sequences were already locally defined, a third sequence overlying the LMU represents two newly defined lithostratigraphical units, named the Goirle and the Tilburg members, positioned in this study at the base of the Oosterhout Formation. Besides their unique lithological characteristics, in seismic reflection profiles the Goirle and the Tilburg members stand out because of their distinct seismic facies. Use of an integrated, multidisciplinary and regional approach, an improved southern North Sea framework and more comprehensive lithostratigraphic subdivision of Neogene successions is proposed for the Netherlands, to make (cross-border) correlations more straightforward in the future.

This study of the ~ameli Basin presents a detailed basin evolution combined with structural analysis and provides the first detailed time-stratigraphic framework for the neotectonic development of Neogene grabens along the Fethiye-Burdur Fault Zone in southwestern Anatolia. During the Early Tortonian, the ~ameli Basin was established as a broad fault-bounded fluviolacustrine basin that experienced NW-SE extension. By Mid-Pliocene time, continued NW-SE extension resulted in the formation of a new intrabasinal fault zone that split the basin longitudinally into two compartments. The development of a new generation of normal faults further split the basin into four narrow half-graben compartments at the end of the Late Pliocene. Structural analysis of basin-bounding and intrabasinal faults related to this three-stage basin development shows that NW-SE extension apparently persisted from Late Miocene to early Quaternary time. The youngest (i.e. Holocene), deformation is characterized by dextral shear along NE-SW-trending strikeslip faults and continuing NW-SE extension. The Late Miocene foundering of the basin was related to extension in the northerly hinterland zone of the still-emplacing Lycian nappes, whereas outward growth of the Hellenic Arc in response to the westward Anatolian extrusion is the main cause for NW-SE extension from the Pliocene onward. Dextral strike-slip faulting is localized and is associated with the activity of NW-SE-trending faults that accommodated NE-SW extension. The simultaneous activity of these faults suggests the existence of biaxial extensional tectonics, as initially proposed for the Burdur-Dinar area. Sinistral strike-slip faulting, continuing along the eastern Hellenic Arc, penetrated the southernmost part of Turkey but has not yet reached the Cameli Basin area. Our biostratigraphically well-constrained tectonosedimentary model for the evolution of the Cameli Basin provides a reliable time-stratigraphic framework for NE-SW extension in the 'Fethiye-Burdur Fault Zone' of SW Anatolia. We believe that this fault zone represents a broad zone of isolated or interconnected NE-SW-trending basins that formed under prevailing NW-SE extension, rather than being a significant strike-slip fault zone.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

A five years geological mapping project, in which the Netherlands Continental Shelf has been re-examined using all publicly available data, resulted in an important update of the existing dataset. The stratigraphy of over 400 wells has been re-interpreted. New depth and thickness grids, based mainly on the interpretation of 3D seismic data have been produced for the most important stratigraphic intervals from Permian Upper Rotliegend to Neogene. New reservoir grids describe the top, base and thickness of 30 (potential) reservoir units in the area. In addition, the uncertainty related to interpretation and further processing of the data has been assessed. This resulted in maps displaying the standard deviation for the depth of the main stratigraphic intervals. Based on these results and the data already available for the onshore area, an updated structural element map was made for the Netherlands.

Most geodynamical models for the kinematics of the central Mediterranean recognise that major tectonic rotations must have played an important role during the Neogene. The Hellenic arc is believed to have been subjected to clockwise rotations in the west and counterclockwise rotations in the east, while the southern part (Crete) shows no rotations (Kissel and Laj, 1988). Many qualitative and quantitative models are based on the idea that Crete did not rotate. We present new palaeomagnetic data which show that post-early Messinian counterclockwise rotations have occurred on Crete. The amount of counterclockwise rotation generally varies between 10º and 20º, but in central Crete much larger rotations (up to ¾40º counterclockwise) were found. Only a few sections did not show any rotation. The anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility (AMS) shows lineations, which are consistently WNW-ESE throughout Crete, indicating post-rotational WNW-ESE extension, or NNE-SSE compression. The observed counterclockwise rotations are consistent with the results of tectonic modelling by Ten Veen and Meijer (1998). The latter study compares the late-Middle Miocene to Recent kinematics with modelled intra-plate stresses for various possible distributions of plate boundary forces. Observations reveal that motion along left-lateral and right-lateral faults occurred during the Pliocene. The model analysis shows these motions to be consistent with transform resistance along the eastern segment of the overriding margin. The counterclockwise block rotations observed by us are probably a consequence of displacements along the left-lateral and right-lateral faults and could reflect a similar tectonic regime that involved transform resistance.