No abstract

A partial review of published experiments which appeared to have a bearing on this subject was compiled by two of the present w'riters in 1913 (4). 3 In this review, results were grouped under two headings; (a) experiments showing higher nitrate content under plants than in fallow land, (b) experiments indicating a depressed nitrate formation under plants. It is significant that the soils in which it was found that the nitrate content under living plants was higher than in similar soil under fallow were all made during the earlier stages. of growth of the plants and that the analyses that indicated a. depressed nitrate formation were all made at a later stage or at maturity.A short time afterwards Russell (7) reported some experiments on this subject and also reviewed some of the literature. His own experiments, and most of those which he cited, indicated only a depressed nitrate formation in soil bearing plants.It should be noted that with the exception of those which did not indicate a depression of nitrate formation by the crop all of the analyses reported by Russell were made when the plants had reached maturity.Russell cited an investigation by \Varington (9) who found an apparent disappearance of nitrate nitrogen on cropped land. \Varington suggested that the crop may have taken up this nitrogen and afterwards lost it, presumably to the air. Russell, howeyer, holds that the disappearance of nitrate nitrogen in the cropped soil is more properly to be attr~buted to diminished production and further that the diminished production is not to be traced to the effect of the crop 10n the 'temperature ot: moisture content of the soil.Beside the theory advanced by Vvarington to account for the disappearance of nitrates in soil accompanying the growth of plants, one has been proposed by Deherain (r) to the effect that the growing plant by removing moisture from the soil

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract