The multi-criteria group decision-making methods under fuzzy environments are developed to cope with imprecise and uncertain information for solving the complex group decision-making problems. A team of some professional experts for the assessment is established to judge candidates or alternatives among the chosen evaluation criteria. In this paper, a novel multi-criteria weighting and ranking model is introduced with interval-valued hesitant fuzzy setting, namely IVHF-MCWR, based on the group decision analysis. The interval-valued hesitant fuzzy set theory is a powerful tool to deal with uncertainty by considering some interval-values for an alternative under a set regarding assessment factors. In procedure of the proposed IVHF-MCWR model, weights of criteria as well as experts are considered to decrease the errors. In this regard, optimal criteria' weights are computed by utilizing an extended maximizing deviation method based on IVHFHamming distance measure. In addition, experts' judgments are taken into account for computing the criteria' weights. Also, experts' weights are determined based on proposed new IVHF technique for order performance by similarity to ideal solution method. Then, a new IVHFindex based on Hamming distance measure is introduced to compute the relative closeness coefficient for ranking the candidates or alternatives. Finally, two application examples about the location and supplier selection problems are considered to indicate the capability of the proposed IVHF-MCWR model. In addition, comparative analysis is reported to compare the proposed model and three fuzzy decision methods from the recent literature. Comparing these approaches and computational results shows that the IVHF-MCWR model works properly under uncertain conditions.
Selecting a suitable construction project is a significant issue for contractors to decrease their costs. In real cases, the imprecise and uncertain information lead to decisions made based on vagueness. Fuzzy sets theory could help decision makers (DMs) to address incomplete information. However, this article develops a new integrated multi-criteria group decision-making model based on compromise solution and linear assignment approaches with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets (IVIFSs). IVIFSs by presenting a membership and non-membership degree for each candidate based on appraisement criteria could decrease the vagueness of selection decisions. The proposed algorithm involves a new decision process under uncertain conditions to determine the importance of criteria and DMs, separately. In this regard, no subjective or additional information is needed for this process; only the input information required is an alternative assessment matric. In this approach, weights of criteria and DMs are specified based on novel indexes to increase the reliability of obtained results. In this respect, the criteria’ weights are computed regarding entropy concepts. The basis for calculating the weight of each DM is the distance between each DM and an average of the DMs’ community. Furthermore, the linear assignment model is extended to rank the candidates. A case study about the construction project selection problem (CPSP) is illustrated to indicate the application of proposed model.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.