A new hesitant fuzzy analytical hierarchy process method for decision-making problems under uncertainty

Mousavi, Seyed Meysam; Gitinavard, Hossein; Siadat, Ali

doi:10.1109/ieem.2014.7058713

Cited by 19 publications

(17 citation statements)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Gu et al [30] used the same criteria as Pan [80] and Mousavi et al [81]. These were quality, cost, safety, duration and shape.…”

Section: Constructionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Pan [80] suggested three different types of construction methods: full-span, pre-cast and launching, and applied Fuzzy AHP. Then, Mousavi et al [81] proposed a modified type of Fuzzy AHP with the same criteria and type of construction used by Pan. Mousavi et al [81] made a comparison between both methods and stated that the comparison analysis shows that the ranking of the proposed HF-AHP method is similar to the ranking of Pan's [80] method.…”

Section: Constructionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Then, Mousavi et al [81] proposed a modified type of Fuzzy AHP with the same criteria and type of construction used by Pan. Mousavi et al [81] made a comparison between both methods and stated that the comparison analysis shows that the ranking of the proposed HF-AHP method is similar to the ranking of Pan's [80] method. AHP was used to evaluate factor weights and Fuzzy was used to take into account the uncertainty.…”

Section: Constructionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

A Review of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods Applied to the Sustainable Bridge Design

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract:The construction of bridges has been necessary for societies since ancient times, when the communication between and within towns, cities or communities was established. Until recently, the economic factor has been the only one considered in the decision-making of any type of construction process for bridges. However, nowadays, the objective should not be just the construction of bridges, but of sustainable bridges. Economic, social and environmental factors, which form the three pillars of sustainability, have been recently added. These three factors usually have conflicting perspectives. The decision-making process allows the conversion of a judgment into a rational procedure to reach a compromise solution. The aim of this paper is to review different methods and sustainable criteria used for decision-making at each life-cycle phase of a bridge, from design to recycling or demolition. This paper examines 77 journal articles for which different methods have been used. The most used methods are briefly described. In addition, a statistical study was carried out on the Multiple Attribute Decision-making papers reviewed.

show abstract

“…Gu et al [30] used the same criteria as Pan [80] and Mousavi et al [81]. These were quality, cost, safety, duration and shape.…”

Section: Constructionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Constructionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Constructionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A Review of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods Applied to the Sustainable Bridge Design

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Mousavi et al [30] propose a method called hesitant fuzzy AHP (HF-AHP) in which decision-makers' (DMs) evaluations for comparison matrices are expressed by linguistic variables and then judgments are aggregated by utilizing the hesitant fuzzy geometric operator.…”

Section: Hesitant Fuzzy Sets and Hesitant Fuzzy Ahpmentioning

confidence: 99%

A hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets-based AHP approach for analyzing the performance evaluation factors: an application to cargo sector

Tüysüz

Şimşek

2017

Complex Intell. Syst.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

One of the important points in performance measurement and evaluation is determining the relative importance of the metrics used. The aim of this study is to present a fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making approach for evaluating the factors used for performance evaluation. Hesitant fuzzy sets-based analytic hierarchy process method, which is an effective and successful approach to deal with uncertainty, is proposed for analyzing the factors affecting the performance of the branches of a cargo company in Turkey and also for prioritizing them according to their level of importance.

show abstract

“…In addition, among the modern fuzzy sets, hesitant fuzzy set (HFS) which is first introduced by Torra (2010) and Torra and Narukawa (2009) is an appropriate tool to cope with uncertainty. This fuzzy set theory is in more attention by researchers such as Mousavi et al, 2014). Also, Chen et al (2013) defined the IVHFS which allows the experts to assign their opinions by some intervalvalues membership degrees for a candidate under a set to margin of errors and more interested for authors such as (Gitinavard et al 2015;Tavakkoli-Moghaddam et al, 2015).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 97%

An Interval- Valued Hesitant Fuzzy Ranking Method based on Group Decision Analysis for Green Supplier Selection

Darabi

Heydari

2016

IFAC-PapersOnLine

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Selecting the most suitable green supplier is one of the main issues for companies. In this paper, an interval-valued hesitant fuzzy ranking method is proposed to rank the green suppliers candidates under conflicted criteria. Hence, the weight of each expert is obtained by extended entropy method based on interval-valued hesitant fuzzy set (IVHFS) approach. In addition, the criteria weights are determined based on preference judgments of experts and the effect of experts' weights. Considering the IVHFS allows the experts to determine some interval-values membership degrees for each green supplier under a set and also applying the criteria and experts weights could lead to a precise approach. Finally, an illustrative example of the green supplier selection is provided to show the validity and applicability of the proposed method.

show abstract

A new hesitant fuzzy analytical hierarchy process method for decision-making problems under uncertainty

Cited by 19 publications

References 7 publications

A Review of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods Applied to the Sustainable Bridge Design

A Review of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods Applied to the Sustainable Bridge Design

A hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets-based AHP approach for analyzing the performance evaluation factors: an application to cargo sector

An Interval- Valued Hesitant Fuzzy Ranking Method based on Group Decision Analysis for Green Supplier Selection

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About