2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00500-015-2006-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soft computing-based new interval-valued hesitant fuzzy multi-criteria group assessment method with last aggregation to industrial decision problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Chatterjee and Bose (2012), Nguyen et al (2015) and also Akhavan et al (2015) studied different MCDM problems using COPRAS-F method. COPRAS method has also been handled by new extensions of fuzzy sets such as intuitionistic or hesitant fuzzy sets (Razavi Hajiagha et al 2013;Bausys et al 2015;Gitinavard et al 2016). …”
Section: Literature Review On Copras-g Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chatterjee and Bose (2012), Nguyen et al (2015) and also Akhavan et al (2015) studied different MCDM problems using COPRAS-F method. COPRAS method has also been handled by new extensions of fuzzy sets such as intuitionistic or hesitant fuzzy sets (Razavi Hajiagha et al 2013;Bausys et al 2015;Gitinavard et al 2016). …”
Section: Literature Review On Copras-g Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the past few years, it has been successfully applied to a vast range of decision making problems [40][41][42] . Assumed that the performance ratings of m alternatives with respect to n criteria are represented as a decision matrix …”
Section: The Copras Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The applications of MCDM have been widely discussed in many fields, such as supplier selection [4], [5], fault diagnosis [6], [7], and heartcare management [8], [9]. To make the decision outcome reliable, some techniques are applied to its optimization processes, including analytical hierarchy process (AHP) [10]- [12], decision making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) method [13], [14], and technique for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution (TOPSIS) method [15]- [17]. The estimation outcome is assessed by combining the experts' synthesized opinions, it is vital to consider the uncertain information in the learning process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%