Because existing surgical and management methods can consistently cure only early-stage ovarian cancer, novel strategies for early detection are required. Silencing of tumor suppressor genes such as p16 INK4a , VHL, and hMLH1 have established promoter hypermethylation as a common mechanism for tumor suppressor inactivation in human cancer and as a promising target for molecular detection in bodily fluids. Using sensitive methylation-specific PCR, we screened matched tumor, preoperative serum or plasma, and peritoneal fluid (washes or ascites) DNA obtained from 50 patients with ovarian or primary peritoneal tumors for hypermethylation status of the normally unmethylated BRCA1 and RAS association domain family protein 1A tumor suppressor genes. Hypermethylation of one or both genes was found in 34 tumor DNA (68%). Additional examination of one or more of the adenomatous polyposis coli, p14 ARF , p16INK4a , or death associated protein-kinase tumor suppressor genes revealed hypermethylation in each of the remaining 16 tumor DNA, which extended diagnostic coverage to 100%. Hypermethylation was observed in all histologic cell types, grades, and stages of ovarian tumor examined. An identical pattern of gene hypermethylation was found in the matched serum DNA from 41 of 50 patients (82% sensitivity), including 13 of 17 cases of stage I disease. Hypermethylation was detected in 28 of 30 peritoneal fluid DNA from stage IC-IV patients, including 3 cases with negative or atypical cytology. In contrast, no hypermethylation was observed in nonneoplastic tissue, peritoneal fluid, or serum from 40 control women (100% specificity). We conclude that promoter hypermethylation is a common and relatively early event in ovarian tumorigenesis that can be detected in the serum DNA from patients with ovary-confined (stage IA or B) tumors and in cytologically negative peritoneal fluid. Analysis of tumor-specific hypermethylation in serum DNA may enhance early detection of ovarian cancer.
Summary To evaluate the feasibility of nipple aspiration and to identify intermediate markers of breast cancer risk, nipple aspirate fluid (NAF) was collected from 177 subjects using a modified breast pump. The first 33 subjects demonstrated that we could obtain NAF quickly, reliably and repeatedly. Specimens from the remaining 144 (Giuliano, 1994). Additional screening tools to identify precancer and early breast cancer are urgently needed.Although the early detection of breast cancer will lead to a higher cure rate, the ideal form of treatment is prevention. The prevention of breast cancer is hindered by the difficulty in identifying an effective agent. Effective agents are difficult to identify in part because of the long period required for breast cancer to develop and, consequently, the requirement for lengthy clinical trials to test the efficacy of the agent, if the end point is the prevention of cancer. One way to shorten the time to finding of an effective agent is the identification of intermediate biomarkers, which are biological alterations in cells or tissue that occur between the time of initiation and tumour invasion. The theory is that an agent that partially or completely reverses the intermediate biomarker back to a normal phenotype may be interrupting carcinogenesis. Validation of the biomarker would require that the agent also decrease the incidence of cancer. Evaluating the effect of the agent requires the analysis of tissue, cells or non-cellular fluid. Nipple
Thyroid nodules are approximately 4 times more common in women than in men. Palpable nodules increase in frequency throughout life, reaching a prevalence of approximately 5% in the United States population aged 50 years and older. 1-3 Nodules are even more prevalent when the thyroid gland is examined at autopsy or surgery, or when using ultrasonography, and 50% of these have nodules, which are almost always benign. 2,4 New nodules develop at a rate of approximately 0.1% per year beginning in early life, but at a much higher rate (~2% per year) after exposure to head and neck irradiation. 5,6 By contrast, thyroid carcinoma is uncommon. For the United States population, the lifetime risk of NCCN
Differentiated thyroid carcinomas is associated with an excellent prognosis. The treatment of choice for differentiated thyroid carcinoma is surgery, followed by radioactive iodine ablation (iodine-131) in select patients and thyroxine therapy in most patients. Surgery is also the main treatment for medullary thyroid carcinoma, and kinase inhibitors may be appropriate for select patients with recurrent or persistent disease that is not resectable. Anaplastic thyroid carcinoma is almost uniformly lethal, and iodine-131 imaging and radioactive iodine cannot be used. When systemic therapy is indicated, targeted therapy options are preferred. This article describes NCCN recommendations regarding management of medullary thyroid carcinoma and anaplastic thyroid carcinoma, and surgical management of differentiated thyroid carcinoma (papillary, follicular, Hürthle cell carcinoma).
These NCCN Guidelines Insights focus on some of the major updates to the 2014 NCCN Guidelines for Thyroid Carcinoma. Kinase inhibitor therapy may be used to treat thyroid carcinoma that is symptomatic and/or progressive and not amenable to treatment with radioactive iodine. Sorafenib may be considered for select patients with metastatic differentiated thyroid carcinoma, whereas vandetanib or cabozantinib may be recommended for select patients with metastatic medullary thyroid carcinoma. Other kinase inhibitors may be considered for select patients with either type of thyroid carcinoma. A new section on "Principles of Kinase Inhibitor Therapy in Advanced Thyroid Cancer" was added to the NCCN Guidelines to assist with using these novel targeted agents.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.