A total of 80 patients with chronic, stable psoriasis, 34 of whom also had psoriatic arthritis, were treated with 1122 mg/day eicosapentaenoic acid ethyl ester and 756 mg/day docosahexaenoic acid ethyl ester. Before the study and after 4 and 8 weeks of treatment a Psoriatic Association scoring index (PASI) score was assessed. Before treatment the mean PASI score was 3.56, after 4 weeks 1.98 and after 8 weeks 1.24; the decrease in the score was highly significant (P less than 0.001). The degree of pruritus decreased most rapidly, followed by scaling and induration of the plaques, and erythema was most persistent. At the end of the trial, seven patients were completely healed and in 13 other patients more than 75% healing was observed but in 14 patients the result was poor. The majority of patients with psoriatic arthritis reported a subjective improvement in joint pain during the study. It is concluded that polyunsaturated ethyl ester lipids may be useful for the treatment of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis and may provide an important adjuvant to standard therapy of both conditions.
Imedeen, a new compound for oral administration consisting of special protein fractions and some glucosaminoglycans extracted from marine fish, has been shown in previous pilot studies to have a repairing effect on sun-damaged skin. In an open study, 10 females with sun-damaged skin, aged 39-61 years, were treated with 0.5 g/day Imedeen for 90 days. At baseline and after 30, 60 and 90 days, the following parameters were clinically evaluated: wrinkles; mottles; dryness of skin; and brittleness of hair and nails. After 90 days' treatment all signs of sun-damage had improved and brittleness of hair and nails was normalized in all cases. These clinical observations were confirmed by changes in skin thickness and elasticity. In a second double-blind study, 30 females in the same age range and with similar signs of sun-damage were treated with 0.5 g/day Imedeen or placebo for 90 days. The results in the Imedeen-treated group corresponded to those in the first study whereas no response to treatment was observed in the placebo treatment group.
Fifty heterosexual male patients with histologically verified genital warts of short duration ( < 3 months) were randomly allocated to treatment with either 0 25% or 05% idoxuridine
One hundred and twenty male patients with signs and symptoms compatible with non-gonococcal urethritis were enrolled in a prospective-randomized study to compare the efficacy and safety of a single oral-dose of 1 g azithromycin and a seven-day course of 100 mg doxycycline twice-daily. Clinical examination and culture samples for Chlamydia trachomatis were performed before and approximately 8, 15 and 35 days after starting treatment. Both treatment groups were comprised of 30 chlamydia-positive patients evaluable for efficacy. The eradication rate of C. trachomatis in baseline-positive patients at the first follow-up visit in the azithromycin group was 96% with one persistent case, and 100% in the doxycycline group. After about two weeks, there were two re-occurrences in the azithromycin group, resulting in a cumulative eradication rate of 90% with three culture-positive cases. The corresponding figure in the doxycycline group was still 100%, but there were leucocytes present in the urethral smear of two patients who later proved to be true culture-positive re-occurrences. After about five weeks, there was an additional re-occurrence in the azithromycin group leading to a cumulative eradication rate of 87%, while two re-occurrences in the doxycycline group gave a cumulative eradication rate of 93%. There was no statistically significant difference in efficacy between the single-dose azithromycin and seven-day course of doxycycline in the treatment of patients with chlamydial urethritis.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.