Tulisan ini tentang menggali wawasan Islam nusantara dengan mengembangkan nilai-nilai kearifan lokal di beberapa daerah di Indonesia. Nilai kearifan lokal di Indonesia sangat beragam, sehingga Indonesia memiliki semboyan yaitu “Bhineka Tunggal Ika”. Namun, Indonesia mendapat tantangan di mana perjumpaan Islam dengan budaya lokal itu seringkali menimbulkan akulturasi budaya. Sehingga kondisi ini menyebabkan ekpresi Islam tampil beragam dan bervariasi sehingga kaya kreativitas kultural-religius, tetapi dalam wilayah dan bidang tertentu telah terjadi penyimpangan dari Islam. Ditambah dengan kehadiran dua kelompok sekaligus yaitu liberal dan radikal, di mana dua kelompok ini terus berupaya menyudutkan penganut Ahlussunnah wal Jamaah (Aswaja) yang mengutamakan sikap moderat (tawasuth), keseimbangan (tawazun), dan toleransi (tasamuh). Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui manhaj Islam Nusantara di Indonesia, serta untuk mengetahui bagaimana relevansi tradisi budaya lokal dengan Islam Nusantara. Metode penulisan ini adalah kualitatif yang bersifat deskriptif-analitik, yaitu peneliti mendeskripsikan konstruksi dasar Islam Nusantara dan kearifan lokal (local wisdom), lalu dianalisis secara kritis dan komprehensif.
The background of this paper departs from concern over the fragility of the value of Indonesia's sovereignty which has an impact on the violations of the rights of Indonesian citizens (human rights). Law No. 22 of 2001 on Oil and Gas (Oil and Gas Law) has undermined the sovereignty of the state and the nation's economic sovereignty. Oil and Gas Law poses systemic impact on people's lives and could harm the country's finances. This is because oil and gas law opened liberalization of oil and gas management which is highly dominated by foreign entity since oil and gas world in Indonesia is dominated by foreign companies up to 89 percent. Therefore, in an effort to restore the sovereignty of the Republic of Indonesia in the field of oil and gas, the Constitutional Court as a State institution has taken progressive step in its decision No. 36 / PUU-X / 2012 on the dissolution of BP Migas. The legal policy of the Court decision constitute a wise choice and is a progressive step in the field of law, especially the protection of human rights of the people of Indonesia.
Protection of human rights (human rights) in the Constitution applies in Indonesia ever prove that one of the requirements for a state law is the guarantee of human rights. Indonesia assertion of law set forth in the 1945 amendment of Article 1 paragraph (3) “State of Indonesia is the Rule of Law”. The form states have laws on the protection of human rights in implementation by the Constitutional Court (MK) in Decision No. 46/PUU-VIII/2010 on the Status of Child Marriages outside. Political decisions of law sought to protect the rights of the child, in addition to trying to dismantle the positivistic-legalistic law, which for year’s had been shackled for justice and human rights. However, in Indonesia the law of the Constitutional Court reap the political pros and cons. Therefore, it is necessary socialization broadly relevant decision of the Court, the Court of law that political action are on the correct constitution, embodying the rule of law and democratic ideals for the sake of our nationhood and nation’s dignity. Constitutional Court’s decision is a wise choice and a step forward in the field of law for the defense of children’s rights that have long shackled Article 43 of the Act. N0. 1 of 1974 on Marriage. To be effective this decision the government should immediately respond with a set of supporting regulations that can be implemented by the Ministry of Religious Affairs and Ministry of Interior.
Patriarchism’s Islam is not a form of accusation that Islam is a patriarchal religion. Patriarchism’s Islam here is a way of interpretation by certain circles, because of its cultural, political, social and historical role of specific, resulting in the claim that Islam is a religion that favor the ideology of patriarchy. This patriarchal ideology that considers women as inferior beings position than men. This forms a negative paradigm to the framers of the law in particular is the law. No. 1 Year 1974 About Marriage. As a result of the UUP, women in Indonesia, suffered discrimination and injustice, this is certainly a violation of human rights. The protection of women's rights is the duty of the government of Indonesia. Therefore, reform/amendment UUP is a necessity that should be done, in order of justice, equality and protection of human rights, especially as indigenous efforts in Indonesia.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.