Background: Validated, inclusive and easy-to-use outcomes for hidradenitis suppurativa are essential both in the clinical trial setting and clinical practice. The continuous IHS4 is a validated tool that dynamically assesses nodules/abscesses/draining tunnels and classifies disease severity as mild/moderate/severe. However, dichotomous outcomes are often required for clinical trials reporting.Objective: To develop and validate a dichotomous outcome based on IHS4 that can be used in clinical trial settings and day-to-day clinical practice.Methods: De-identified data from the PIONEER-I and -II studies were accessed through Vivli. Potential IHS4 thresholds were analysed using baseline to Week 12 data from adalimumab-and placebo-treated hidradenitis suppurativa patients in the PIONEER-I trial. The final threshold was chosen based on its ability to discriminate between patients treated with adalimumab or placebo and its association with
Background
Correct daily skin care is important regarding hand eczema (HE). However, only a few studies have evaluated the level of knowledge among hospital cleaners.
Objective
To examine the level of knowledge regarding skin protective behaviour and risk factors with respect to HE in hospital cleaners.
Methods
All cleaners working in four hospitals in Denmark were invited to participate in the study, which was based on a questionnaire consisting of 22 questions.
Results
142 of 236 cleaners (response rate = 60.1%) were included. The mean of total correct answers were approximately five out of nine questions. 85.6% of participants evaluated themselves to have a low degree of knowledge of skin care and protection. Based on the number of correct answers, 90% were defined as having low knowledge. Being born or raised outside of Denmark was statistically significantly associated with lower level of knowledge. Risk factors for HE such as, work with wet hands, and use of household cleaning products were only recognized as risk factors by less than 50%.
Conclusion
Our study indicates that Danish hospital cleaners have a low degree of knowledge regarding skin care and protection. Cleaning workers born or raised outside of Denmark are in need of special attention.
Background
Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory disease influenced by genetics, non‐genetic and environmental factors that modulate miRNA expression. Currently, no miRNA data are available for HS. In this study, we profiled DNA methylation patterns of miRNA genes associated with HS susceptibility.
Objectives
Identify miRNA gene methylation profiles associated with HS susceptibility. This study examined the methylation patterns of DNAs from 24 healthy controls and 24 patients with HS using Illumina Infinium MethylationEPIC BeadChip array analysis. Methylation patterns of miRNA genes were analysed using KEGG pathway analysis to explore the inversely correlated pathways regulated by miRNAs.
Results
We identified 60 CpG sites representing 65 unique microRNA genes including 54 hypomethylated and 6 hypermethylated CpGs as potentially associated with HS. Some of these CpGs were found to be critical for skin function, such as miR‐29, miR‐200, miR‐205, miR‐548 and miR‐132. The miR‐192 is implicated in non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease. The miR‐200c gene was identified as a vital determinant in regulating skin repair after injury and may contribute to age‐associated alterations in wound repair. miR‐132 was significantly upregulated during the inflammation phase of wound repair, enhancing the activity of STAT3 and ERK pathways that promote keratinocyte proliferation.
Conclusions
Epigenetically altered microRNA genes are implicated in wound healing, inflammation, keratinocyte proliferation and wound modulation. This is the first study to analyse methylation profiles of miRNA genes in the HS population, highlighting the unique role that miRNAs might play in diagnosing and treating HS.
The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of treatment with Janus kinase inhibitors for alopecia areata, measured by change in Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) score. A systematic review following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines was performed using Medline, EMBASE and Cochrane library. All studies investigating the efficacy of treatments for alopecia areata were included. Primary outcomes were the proportion of patients with alopecia areata achieving 30%, 50%, 75%, 90% and 100% improvement in SALT score after treatment with a Janus kinase inhibitor. A meta-analysis was performed including all randomized controlled trials investigating Janus kinase inhibitors. A total of 37 studies matched the inclusion criteria and were included. Meta-analysis was performed based on 5 randomized studies. Regarding patients with alopecia areata defined as ≥ 50% scalp hair loss, baricitinib 4 mg once daily demonstrated the highest efficacy. However, among patients with alopecia areata defined as a SALT score ≥ 50, oral deuruxolitinib 12 mg twice daily demonstrated the highest efficacy. Deuruxolitinib and baricitinib appear to be promising drugs for the treatment of alopecia areata. However, the response depends on the dosage of the drug. More randomized trials, with identical inclusion criteria and dose and duration of treatment, are required to confirm these findings.
Hidradenitis suppurativa remains a clinical challenge to patients and physicians alike. Physicians should be familiar with the impact this disease has on the patient and with the range of treatments available. Use of simple incisions as treatment is strongly discouraged. Additional pathogenic as well as therapeutic studies are necessary.
Our experience suggests that a significant proportion of PPG can be managed by topical treatment alone. The simple topical treatment allows the patient to continue use of stoma care products while minimizing the potential for side effects.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.