2022
DOI: 10.1111/jdv.18632
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and validation of IHS4‐55, an IHS4 dichotomous outcome to assess treatment effect for hidradenitis suppurativa

Abstract: Background: Validated, inclusive and easy-to-use outcomes for hidradenitis suppurativa are essential both in the clinical trial setting and clinical practice. The continuous IHS4 is a validated tool that dynamically assesses nodules/abscesses/draining tunnels and classifies disease severity as mild/moderate/severe. However, dichotomous outcomes are often required for clinical trials reporting.Objective: To develop and validate a dichotomous outcome based on IHS4 that can be used in clinical trial settings and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0
10

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
35
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, attention is currently being devoted to improving outcome measures [ 11 , 12 ] and developing human HS models [ 13 , 14 ]. Such models contain ex vivo systems such as the 3D-SeboSkin model [ 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, attention is currently being devoted to improving outcome measures [ 11 , 12 ] and developing human HS models [ 13 , 14 ]. Such models contain ex vivo systems such as the 3D-SeboSkin model [ 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was calculated using the following formula: (number of nodules × 1) + (number of abscesses × 2) + (number of fistulas × 4) [ 12 ]. The reduction of 55% in the IHS4 score was also collected (IHS4-55) [ 13 ]. The Hurley classification was used to assess structural damage.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(number of fistulas 9 4) [12]. The reduction of 55% in the IHS4 score was also collected (IHS4-55) [13].…”
Section: Main Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…draining tunnels × 4) as the threshold for responsiveness—have been suggested as feasible validated instruments to assess therapeutic responsiveness. However, because both still require lesion identification and quantification, some of the same issues of reliability and reproducibility exist with these instruments . The Hidradenitis Area and Severity Index Revised (HASI-R), which incorporates signs of disease activity and body surface area without the need for lesion counts, is a reliable and valid instrument for measuring HS disease severity .…”
Section: The Current Landscape Of Hs Disease Activity Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%