Experts' cognitive abilities adapt in response to the challenges they face in order to produce elite-level performance. Expert athletes, in particular, must integrate their motor capabilities with their cognitive and perceptual processes. Indoor rock climbers are particularly unique athletes in that much of the challenge they face is to accurately perceive and consolidate multiple movements into manageable action plans. In the current study, we investigated how climbers' level of expertise influenced their perception of action capabilities, visual memory of holds, and memory of planned and performed motor sequences. In Experiment 1, climbers judged their perceived capability to perform single climbing moves and then attempted each movement. Skilled climbers were less confident, but perceived their action capabilities more accurately than less skilled climbers. In Experiment 2, climbers recalled holds on a route, as well as predicted and recalled move sequences before and after climbing, respectively. Expertise was positively associated with visual memory performance as well as planned and recalled motor sequence accuracy. Together, these findings contribute to our knowledge of motor expertise and suggest that motor expert's ability to accurately estimate their action capabilities may underlie complex cognitive processes in their domain of expertise.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Measures of perceived affordances—judgments of action capabilities—are an objective way to assess whether users perceive mediated environments similarly to the real world. Previous studies suggest that judgments of stepping over a virtual gap using augmented reality (AR) are underestimated relative to judgments of real-world gaps, which are generally overestimated. Across three experiments, we investigated whether two factors associated with AR devices contributed to the observed underestimation: weight and field of view (FOV). In the first experiment, observers judged whether they could step over virtual gaps while wearing the HoloLens (virtual gaps) or not (real-world gaps). The second experiment tested whether weight contributes to underestimation of perceived affordances by having participants wear the HoloLens during judgments of both virtual and real gaps. We replicated the effect of underestimation of step capabilities in AR as compared to the real world in both Experiments 1 and 2. The third experiment tested whether FOV influenced judgments by simulating a narrow (similar to the HoloLens) FOV in virtual reality (VR). Judgments made with a reduced FOV were compared to judgments made with the wider FOV of the HTC Vive Pro. The results showed relative underestimation of judgments of stepping over gaps in narrow vs. wide FOV VR. Taken together, the results suggest that there is little influence of weight of the HoloLens on perceived affordances for stepping, but that the reduced FOV of the HoloLens may contribute to the underestimation of stepping affordances observed in AR.