AbstrakTujuan penelitian ini diantaranya: (1) menemukan karakteristik perangkat pembelajaran yang dikembangkan, (2) mendeskripsikan kevalidan perangkat pembelajaran, (3) menganalisis keefektifan pembelajaran menggunakan perangkat pembelajaran yang dikembangkan dan (4)
Tujuan penelitian ini yaitu untuk menganalisis profil kemampuan penalaran matematis pada siswa kelas VIII SMPN 10 Kendari berdasarkan perbedaan gender. Jenis penelitian ini menggunakan metode deskriptif dengan pendekatan kuantitatif dan dilengkapi dengan pendekatan kualitatif. Data kualitatif dalam penelitian ini adalah hasil wawancara terhadap siswa. Sedangkan data kuantitatifnya diperoleh dari hasil pemberian tes kemampuan penalaran matematis. Data-data ini direduksi dan dianalisis untuk menjawab fokus penelitian. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan: (1) secara umum kemampuan penalaran matematis pada siswa kelas VIII SMPN 10 Kendari dengan kategori sangat rendah, (2) berdasarkan jenis kelamin, kemampuan penalaran matematis siswa perempuan lebih baik dibandingkan siswa laki-laki, dimana persentase kemampuan penalaran matematis siswa yang berjenis kelamin laki-laki sebesar 47,62% dan persentase kemampuan penalaran matematis pada siswa perempuan sebesar 52,38%.
The purpose of this research is to analyze the improvement of students' mathematical literacy ability through the use of mathematics teaching materials with metacognitive approach guidance. This research will be held in the city of Kendari to the subject of this research target is students who are at grade 5 Land in Junior High VIIID Kendari years lessons 2017/2018 with many limited scale trial class is only required as much as 1 class. To know the significance of the increase in the literacy abilities of students using paired t-test. Data processing using the SPSS program with criteria if α=0,05 then there is an increased of student's mathematical literacy ability. The results of the analysis on the stages of the evaluation shows the learning materials with metacognitive approach guidance can provide better against an increase in student learning. The ability of the early mathematical literacy against students is very less because of learning during this time students have not been directed with the ability of mathematical literacy. After the students get learning by using learning materials through metacognitive approach guidance, the ability of mathematical literacy students' level 3 and level 4 underwent significant improvement.
This study aims to analyze the improvement of geometric reasoning abilities of students of SMA Negeri 1 Sampara, Kabupaten Konawe, Sulawesi Tenggara, Indonesia. Here, we compare three models of learning; (1) STAD cooperative model by GeoGebra assisted; (2) a model of the STAD cooperative without assistance from GeoGebra; and (3) conventional learning models. This study was applied to three different classes, where each class consisted of the high, medium, and low motivation students. Data collection was done by giving a mathematics learning motivation questionnaire and giving a test of students’ geometric reasoning abilities. The data analysis technique uses inferential statistics to test normal assumptions and homogeneity and hypothesis testing using the One-Way ANOVA Test. Based on the results of the study showed that the effect of using the STAD type cooperative learning model with the help of GeoGebra was higher when compared to the other two models. That difference occurs at all levels of motivation. On the other hand, the STAD model without GeoGebra only affects high and moderate motivation students. Meanwhile, low motivation students did not show significant differences with the direct learning model.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.