Purpose: To evaluate and compare the dichotic listening abilities in non-hearing-impaired adults monolingual speakers of the Brazilian Portuguese language (CG) and simultaneous Brazilian Portuguese-German (GG) bilingual speakers or successive Brazilian Portuguese-Italian bilingual speakers (IG). Methods: This is about an observational, descriptive, transverse and quantitative research. The sample consisted of 87 subjects aged between 18 and 55 years, divided into: Control Group (CG), of 30 monolingual speakers of Brazilian Portuguese; Study Group A (SGA), of 31 simultaneous Brazilian Portuguese-German bilingual speakers; and Study Group I (SGI), of 26 successive Brazilian Portuguese-Italian speakers. The individuals were submitted to the Dichotic digits test (DDT) and to Staggered Spondaic Words (SSW). Results: The DTT results showed difference in right ear and total scores when comparing SGA to CG. Comparing the CG and the SGI, it was observed difference in right and left ears and total scores. Comparing the SGA and the SGI, no difference was observed between the groups. Results of SSW showed that both bilingual groups were significantly better in the right and left ears scores and even in total one when compared to CG. Comparing the SGA and the SGI, the SGI showed better significant scores in the right ear and total. Conclusion: Bilingual experiences seem to influence positively the ability of high predictability dichotic listening, evaluated by DDT, and the low predictability dichotic listening, evaluated by SSW test. The SSW results also showed statistically significantly better results for successive Brazilian Portuguese-Italian bilingual speakers when compared to simultaneous Brazilian Portuguese-German speakers.
Mostly patients presents 60 years old or more, with no frequency difference between the sexes. The sensorioneural and moderate hearing losses were the most frequent ones, except in children. More than 99% of the patients were aided and the conducts were defined based in the audiological diagnosis and patient's needs.
OBJETIVO: avaliar crianças e adolescentes, usuários de próteses auditivas, buscando investigar o benefício proporcionado pela amplificação sonora por meio do teste Listas de Sentenças em Português e do Questionário de avaliação do benefício em crianças e adolescentes, e verificar se existe correlação entre os resultados obtidos por meio dos dois instrumentos de avaliação. MÉTODO: estudo retrospectivo, onde foram avaliados 13 sujeitos com idades entre oito e 14 anos, de ambos os sexos, com perda auditiva de no máximo, grau moderadamente severo na melhor orelha, usuários de próteses auditivas bilateralmente há mais de dez meses e protetizados por um Programa de Saúde Auditiva. Foi realizada anamnese, nova avaliação audiológica básica e aplicados o teste Listas de Sentenças em Português e o Questionário de Avaliação do Beneficio em crianças e adolescentes. RESULTADOS: os resultados obtidos no Teste de Listas de Sentenças em Português e no questionário mostraram que houve benefício com o uso das próteses, tanto no silêncio, quanto no ruído. Entretanto, não houve correlação estatisticamente significante entre os resultados. CONCLUSÃO: embora não tenha sido verificada correlação estatisticamente significante entre os resultados obtidos por meio dos dois instrumentos de avaliação, foi observada melhora no desempenho de reconhecimento de fala fazendo uso das próteses através do teste Listas de Sentenças em Português, tanto na avaliação no ruído, quanto no silêncio e, em resposta ao questionário, os avaliados referiram benefício com o uso da amplificação sonora.
TEMA: Características da bulimia nervosa (BN) e do Refluxo Laringofaríngeo (RLF) e alterações vocais e laríngeas que podem decorrer da exposição da laringe ao ácido gástrico. OBJETIVO: Descrever, por meio de revisão de literatura, as características do RLF e da BN, relacionando-os com as alterações vocais e laríngeas que podem se originar da exposição da laringe ao ácido gástrico que ocorre em ambas as condições. CONCLUSÃO: A BN se caracteriza por um transtorno alimentar de causa principalmente psicológica em que ocorre ingestão compulsiva de grande quantidade de alimentos, seguida de episódios de vômitos auto-induzidos com a finalidade de evitar o ganho de peso. O RLF consiste em uma variação clínica da DRGE, na qual o fluxo retrógrado do alimento e do ácido gástrico entra em contato com a laringe e suas estruturas. Em comum, a BN e o RLF apresentam este mecanismo de regurgitação que pode atingir a laringe. Dentre os sinais e sintomas laríngeos e vocais decorrentes da regurgitação do ácido gástrico sobre a laringe estão: globus faríngeo, disfonia, rouquidão, tosse seca, disfagia, halitose, lesões inflamatórias nas pregas vocais, laringite, amigdalite, edema e eritema glótico posterior e ou de aritenóides, da região retrocricóidea e interaritenóidea, estenose subglótica, irregularidades na mucosa das pregas vocais, hipertrofia de mucosa laríngea, leucoplasia, carcinoma, laringoespasmos, granulomas, úlcera de contato, nódulos vocais, pólipos vocais, edema difuso, granuloma, fixação uni ou bilateral de aritenóides, edema de Reinke, laringomalácia, estridor, e odinofagia.
Summary Objective:?Evaluate the proportionate benefit by the sound amplification in children and teenagers attended by the program of hearing health attention by the Federal University of Santa Maria (UFSM). Method:?Participated from these study 63 individuals with age between 3 and 14 years and their family. For the evaluate the benefit proportionate by the sound amplification was applied the Infant Toddler Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale (IT-MAIS), for children with less than 4 years old; the Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale (MAIS), for infants from 4 to 7 years and the questionnaire of evaluation from the benefit in infants and young, for the individuals from 8 to 14 years. Results:?Only one individual could be evaluated through the MAIS scale, and the average punctuation found in the evaluation of the hearing behaviors was of 19,9. Were evaluated 52 individuals through the questionnaire of evaluation of benefit in infants and teenagers, and the positive answers related to the benefit proportionate by the prosthesis in different situations were the most found in all items. Conclusions:?Was verified the benefit proportionate by the sound amplification, in different situations of daily life, such as from the patient's perspective as from his family. In some cases, where were found little or none benefit, there were influence of others clinical alterations, besides the hearing loss, influencing the effective use of the hearing aids.
Purpose: to evaluate and compare cognitive and auditory abilities in normally hearing monolingual and bilingual individuals. Methods: the sample consisted of 21 normally hearing individuals ranging in age between 18 and 25 years, divided into a control group of eight monolingual speakers of Brazilian Portuguese and a study group composed of 13 bilingual speakers of Brazilian Portuguese and German or Italian. The individuals underwent basic audiological assessments as well as assessments of cognitive and auditory figure-background abilities with the BPR-5 and SSW tests, respectively. Results: the assessment of cognitive abilities showed that bilinguals had a better performance for the general cognitive function, with a statistically significant difference, as well as for cognitive abilities of verbal, spatial and mechanical reasoning. Also, for auditory figure-background abilities, there was a statistically significant difference between the study groups, with bilinguals showing a better performance. Conclusions: based on the study groups, it was found that the bilingual subjects had a better performance of their general cognitive function, as compared with monolingual speakers, as well as in their specific cognitive abilities of verbal, spatial and mechanical reasoning, and in the auditory figure-background abilities.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
334 Leonard St
Brooklyn, NY 11211
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.