Dewan Perwakilan Daerah atau DPD merupakan lembaga legislatif yang lahir dari gejolak reformasi 1998 yang keberadaan yuridis terkait DPD dan kewenangannya didasarkan Pasal 22D UUD NRI 1945. Dalam regelende functie maka sejatinya peran DPD sebagai perwakkilan daerah untuk mengimbangi adanya peran Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat sebagai political. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk meninjau dan menganalisis kembali bagaimana seharusnya keberadaan DPD dengan menggunakan metode yuridis normatif melalui pendekatan perundang-undangan (statute approach) dan pendekatan analitis (analytical approch), bahwa keanggotaan DPD haruslah merupakan calon perseorangan yang terbebas dari jabatan dan fungsionaris partai politik. Hal ini untuk mempertegas serta mengoptimalkan peran regional representative supaya dari proses pencalonan, pengangkatan, dan perumusan kebijakan merupakan perorangan yang benar-benar concern terhadap permasalahan, dinamika, dan kepentingan daerah yang diwakilinya.
Relasi kekuasaan antar Presiden dan Wakil Presiden dalam sistem ketatanegaraan Indonesia selama ini dapat dikatakan selalu mengalami pasang surut. Persoalan ini disebabkan pengaturan kewenangan Wakil Presiden dalam UUD NRI Tahun 1945 tidak jelas. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis implikasi yuridis dari kekaburan kewenangan Wakil Presiden serta memberikan rekomendasi ke depan bagaimana seyogyanya kewenangan Presiden dan Wakil Presiden dapat diatur dan dilaksanakan secara proporsional. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif dengan bahan hukum primer berupa UUD NRI 1945 dan bahan hukum sekunder berupa buku dan artikel jurnal berkaitan dengan kewenangan Wakil Presiden. Dari penelitian ini dapat disimpulkan bahwa pengoptimalan kewenangan Wakil Presiden dapat dilakukan dengan mengaturnya di dalam Undang-Undang Lembaga Kepresidenan yang diharapkan dapat membagi secara proporsional kewenangan Presiden dan Wakil Presiden. Oleh karena itu, diharapkan supaya pengaturan Kewenangan Wakil Presiden diatur secara pasti dalam aturan hukum supaya tidak tergantung pada praktik ketatanegaraan serta faktor non hukum, yaitu faktor politik. Mengingat pentingnya fungsi Wakil Presiden dalam sistem ketatanegaraan Republik Indonesia maka alangkah baiknya, Undang-Undang Lembaga Kepresidenan yang mengatur mengenai pembagian wewenang antar Presiden dan Wakil Presiden segera dibentuk. The power relations between the President and Vice President in the Indonesian constitutional system so far can be agreed to always overcome the ups and downs. The 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia is unclear. This study aims to analyze the juridical implications of the obscurity of the Vice President’s authority and give approval to the front regarding the authority of the President and Vice President to be able to regulate and implement proportionality. This research is a normative legal research with primary legal material in the form of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia and secondary legal material containing books and journal articles about the authority of the president’s representative. From this research it can be concluded that optimizing the authority of the Vice President can be done with a license in the Law on Presidential Institutions which is expected to allocate proportional authority to the powers of the President and Vice President. Therefore, it is hoped that the Vice President’s licensing can be regulated in regulating legislation not dependent on state administration and non-legal factors, namely political factors. Considering the importance of the function of the Vice President in the constitutional system of the Republic of Indonesia, it would be nice, the Law on Presidential Institutions governing the distribution of powers between the President and the Vice President was immediately formed.
Constitutional changes are part of the political and legal dynamics of a country. Changes to the constitution aim to meet the legal demands and needs of the community so that they are clearly and firmly regulated in the constitution. This paper is oriented towards the idea of a formal review of constitutional changes in Indonesia. This research is a normative legal research. The approach used in this research is a conceptual approach, a comparative approach, and a statutory approach. The primary legal materials in this study include the text of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, constitutional texts in various countries and the Constitutional Court Decision No. 91/PUU-XVIII/2020. Secondary legal materials include: books, journal articles, and websites related to the constitution and constitutional law. Non-legal materials include legal dictionaries. The results of the study indicate that a formal review of constitutional changes is needed as an effort to maintain the supremacy of the constitution, including also placing the court's function as guardians of the law and the constitution in dealing with the determination of non-legal aspects in constitutional changes
The Sendi customary community is a community that has procedures for implementing customary law through the customary justice system. Not only that, the Sendi customary community also has a distinctive legal code and customary apparatus; so that its existence needs to be maintained in the face of the era of legal modernization. This research is an empirical legal research; by using secondary data types obtained from various searches for journal articles, books, and information through online news online; relating to the substance of the research. The purpose of this research is to describe the structure of Sendi's customary court in maintaining the existence of customary law; as well as describing the strategy of legal pluralism in Sendi's customary court to face modernization of law era. This empirical legal research focuses on the structure of Sendi's customary court with an approach of legal pluralism. The results of the study confirm that a legal pluralism strategy is needed to maintain the existence of the Sendi traditional court in the era of legal modernization; and integration efforts are needed between the law and the customary apparatus of Sendi with the law and the national or state apparatus.
The position of the Constitutional Court Regulation (PMK) in the hierarchy of laws and regulations is not strictly regulated, so it is not known where it is located and which institution has the right to conduct a Judicial Review of it. Therefore, this study will examine three things, namely: (i) the position of PMK, (ii) the implications of PMK that have not been promulgated, and (iii) the institution entitled to conduct a Judicial Review of PMK. The research method used is the normative legal research method. The result is that PMK has a "conditional" position equivalent to a Presidential Regulation because it has the same function. Despite having the same "conditional" position, the PMK has so far not been able to be tested by any institution because it has not been promulgated in the State Gazette, which should also imply that it cannot bind the public. Therefore, PMK should be promulgated in the State Gazette to bind the public, and the institution entitled to examine it is the Supreme Court. That way, the parties in the proceedings at the Constitutional Court will obtain legal certainty and protection.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.