This paper presents the results of the WMT14 shared tasks, which included a standard news translation task, a separate medical translation task, a task for run-time estimation of machine translation quality, and a metrics task. This year, 143 machine translation systems from 23 institutions were submitted to the ten translation directions in the standard translation task. An additional 6 anonymized systems were included, and were then evaluated both automatically and manually. The quality estimation task had four subtasks, with a total of 10 teams, submitting 57 entries.

Findings of the 2016 Conference on Machine Translation (WMT16) Bojar, O.; Chatterjee, R.; Federmann, C.; Graham, Y.; Haddow, B.; Huck, M.; Jimeno Yepes, A.; Koehn, P.; Logacheva, V.; Monz, C.; Negri, M.; Névéol, A.; Neves, M.; Popel, M.; Post, M.; Rubino, R.; Scarton, C.; Specia, L.; Turchi, M.; Verspoor, K.; Zampieri, M.Abstract This paper presents the results of the WMT16 shared tasks, which included five machine translation (MT) tasks (standard news, IT-domain, biomedical, multimodal, pronoun), three evaluation tasks (metrics, tuning, run-time estimation of MT quality), and an automatic post-editing task and bilingual document alignment task. This year, 102 MT systems from 24 institutions (plus 36 anonymized online systems) were submitted to the 12 translation directions in the news translation task. The IT-domain task received 31 submissions from 12 institutions in 7 directions and the Biomedical task received 15 submissions systems from 5 institutions. Evaluation was both automatic and manual (relative ranking and 100-point scale assessments).The quality estimation task had three subtasks, with a total of 14 teams, submitting 39 entries. The automatic post-editing task had a total of 6 teams, submitting 11 entries.1 http://statmt.org/wmt16/results.html 2

No abstract

This paper presents the results of the premier shared task organized alongside the Conference on Machine Translation (WMT) 2019. Participants were asked to build machine translation systems for any of 18 language pairs, to be evaluated on a test set of news stories. The main metric for this task is human judgment of translation quality. The task was also opened up to additional test suites to probe specific aspects of translation.

This paper presents the results of the WMT14 shared tasks, which included a standard news translation task, a separate medical translation task, a task for run-time estimation of machine translation quality, and a metrics task. This year, 143 machine translation systems from 23 institutions were submitted to the ten translation directions in the standard translation task. An additional 6 anonymized systems were included, and were then evaluated both automatically and manually. The quality estimation task had four subtasks, with a total of 10 teams, submitting 57 entries.

This paper presents the results of the premier shared task organized alongside the Conference on Machine Translation (WMT) 2018. Participants were asked to build machine translation systems for any of 7 language pairs in both directions, to be evaluated on a test set of news stories. The main metric for this task is human judgment of translation quality. This year, we also opened up the task to additional test sets to probe specific aspects of translation. Language Sources (Number of Documents) English ABC News (1), BBC (4), Brisbane Times (1), CBS News (1), Daily Mail (4), Euronews (3), Globe and Mail (1), Guardian (4), Independent (4), Los Angeles Times (4), MSNBC (3), Novinte (2), New York Times (2), Reuters (3), Russia Today (2), Scotsman (2), Sydney Morning Herald (2), Telegraph (2), The Local (2), Time Magazine (2), UPI (1), Washington Post (3) Czech blesk.cz (16), deník.cz (5), Deník Referendum (1), DNES.cz (7), lidovky.cz (6), Novinky.cz (3), Reflex (2), tyden.cz (12), ZDN (2) German Aachener Nachrichten (1), Abendzeitung Nürnberg (2), Braunschweiger Zeitung (1

We report the results of the WMT19 shared task on Quality Estimation, i.e. the task of predicting the quality of the output of machine translation systems given just the source text and the hypothesis translations. The task includes estimation at three granularity levels: word, sentence and document. A novel addition is evaluating sentence-level QE against human judgments: in other words, designing MT metrics that do not need a reference translation. This year we include three language pairs, produced solely by neural machine translation systems. Participating teams from eleven institutions submitted a variety of systems to different task variants and language pairs.

We describe Appraise, an open-source toolkit supporting manual evaluation of machine translation output. The system allows to collect human judgments on translation output, implementing annotation tasks such as 1) quality checking, 2) translation ranking, 3) error classification, and 4) manual post-editing. It features an extensible, XML-based format for import/ export and can easily be adapted to new annotation tasks. The current version of Appraise also includes automatic computation of inter-annotator agreements allowing quick access to evaluation results. Appraise is actively developed and used in several MT projects.