Background Gastric adenocarcinoma is an aggressive disease with frequent lymph node (LN) metastases for which lymphadenectomy results in a survival benefit. In the United States, the NCCN guidelines recommend D2 lymphadenectomy or a minimum of 15 LNs retrieved. However, retrieval of only 15 LNs is considered by most international guidelines as inadequate. We seek to evaluate the survival benefits associated with a more complete lymphadenectomy. Study Design An international database was constructed by combining gastric cancer cases from the SEER database (n=13,932) and the Yonsei University Gastric Cancer database (n=11,358)(total n=25,289). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed along with Joinpoint analysis to obtain the optimal number of LNs to retrieve based upon survival. Prognostic significance of number of nodes retrieved was then confirmed with uni- and multivariate analyses. Results Analysis for both mean and median survival yielded 29 LNs removed as the Joinpoint. This was further confirmed with multivariate analysis, where 15 retrieved LNs cutoff fell out of the model while 29 retrieved LNs remained intact with an hazard ratio (HR): 0.799(95%CI 0.759–0.842, p<0.001). Stage-stratified Kaplan- Meier analysis for a cutoff point of 29 also demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in survival. Conclusion Joinpoint analysis has allowed for the creation of a model demonstrating the point at which additional dissection would not provide further benefit. Thus, this large international dataset analysis demonstrates that the maximal survival advantage is seen by performing a lymphadenectomy with a minimum of 29 LNs retrieved.

Background The annual incidence of inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) in the United States reportedly increased during the last quarter of the twentieth century. We investigated whether that increase has continued into the twenty-first century. Methods We queried the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results database for all cases of IBC in women age 20 and older between 1992 and 2009. Cases were breast tumors with at least one of the following codes: extent of disease size 998, extension 70, or ICD-3-O morphology 8530 or 8533. Age-adjusted incidence was also examined. Results During 1992–2009, the annual incidence of IBC did not increase over time in any age group, nor did it vary significantly from year to year, except between 2003 and 2004, when there was a jump from 1.6 (95 % confidence interval 1.4–1.8) to 3.1 (2.8–3.4) cases per 100,000 women. Similar changes occurred in all age and racial groups before gradually returning to prejump levels. Overall, the incidence of IBC rose steeply with age until reaching a plateau at age 65. The incidence was greatest among black women (3.0; 2.8–3.2), intermediate among white women (2.1; 2.1–2.2), and lowest among Asian women (1.4; 1.3–1.6). Conclusions The incidence of IBC has remained essentially stable for nearly two decades. A transient jump in 2003–2004 occurred in all age and racial groups, suggesting adjustment to coding changes at that time. Often described as a disease of younger women, IBC in fact disproportionately affects older women. Racial/ethnic variation in the incidence of IBC suggests that dietary, lifestyle, or genetic factors contribute to its pathogenesis.

Adenocarcinoma of the small bowel accounts for only one per cent of all gastrointestinal malignancies. Duodenal adenocarcinoma accounts for half of all small bowel adenocarcinomas. The duodenum is divided into four segments: D1 (proximal horizontal 5 cm beginning with the 3-cm duodenal bulb), D2 (descending), D3 (distal horizontal), and D4 (ascending). The most common location of duodenal adenocarcinomas is the ampullary region of D2. Based on observational experience, our hypothesis was that primary adenocarcinomas arising from the mucosa of the duodenal bulb are extremely rare or possibly nonexistent. Our institutional cancer registry provided a list of patients for the years 1990 through 2012 who had small bowel cancers. Only those patients with primary adenocarcinomas of the duodenal mucosa were reviewed. Ampullary cancers arising from bile duct mucosa were specifically excluded. Medical records were abstracted to obtain patient age, sex, race, anatomic location of the tumor, disease stage (as per American Joint Committee on Cancer 7th edition staging guidelines), operation performed, and current vital status. A total of 30 patients with primary duodenal adenocarcinomas were identified. The mean age was 58 years and 17 (57%) patients were male. The tumor locations were: D2 in 26 (87%), D3 in two (7%), and D4 in two (7%). No tumors arose from D1. The patients presented with the following stages of disease: Stage 0 is in three (10%), Stage I in three (10%), Stage II in five (17%), Stage III in 15 (50%), and Stage IV in four (13%). These findings combined with a diligent review of 724 reported cases in the English language literature yielded only five clearly defined cases of adenocarcinoma arising from the mucosa of the duodenal bulb. Although a 1991 published multicenter tumor registry series of 128 localized duodenal adenocarcinomas reported 29 D1 tumors, no anatomic distinction was made between duodenal bulb and more distal D1 tumors. Earlier reports used nonanatomic divisions of the duodenum or a simple breakdown into supra-ampullary, periampullary, and infra-ampullary portions. These data beg the question as to why primary duodenal bulb adenocarcinomas are so exceedingly rare. The obvious implication is that the duodenal bulb mucosa may be physiologically, immunologically, or otherwise uniquely privileged to virtually escape oncogenic transformation. The scientific challenge and opportunity is to explore and understand the important phenomena responsible for this finding.

No abstract

Rates of radiation recommendation in the elderly have been steadily decreasing without appreciable acceleration in this decline. This trend was not consistent across all registries. Continued research is necessary to assess differences in clinical practice and its impact on patient outcomes.

The introduction of screening for multiple high and moderate risk mutations in genes has resulted in a complex approach to patient care involving multiple disciplines. We sought to describe the feasibility of a single visit multidisciplinary approach to the management of patients with an identified high/moderate risk gene mutation. Patients who presented to our community hospital over a 1-year period who were found to have a high/moderate risk genetic mutation on a screening panel were referred to the High Risk Genetic Clinic. Thirty-five patients were included. The majority were female [34 (97.1%)], Hispanic [22 (62.9%)], with a family history of cancer [21 (60%)]. Mean age was 40.3 years. Most of the participants had a BRCA1 gene mutation [10 (28.6%)]. Patients were seen at the High Risk Genetic Clinic within a mean of 41.9 days from the day of genetic mutation diagnosis. Four patients did not show and were significantly younger (19.3 vs. 39.6 years, p = 0.014). In this community setting, we provided coordinated care within multiple disciplines related to a genetic mutation in a single clinic visit. Increased efforts at coordinating early care should be directed towards patients diagnosed at a younger age.

BackgroundIrreversible electroporation (IRE) is a non-thermal injury tissue ablation technique that uses electrical pulses to cause cell death. IRE damages the endothelial cells of blood vessels; however these cells re-grow, and thus IRE does not result in permanent damage to blood vessels. We report the novel use of IRE for ablation of microscopically positive margins after resection of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) impinging on hepatic veins.Case presentationA 68-year-old female was found to have colon cancer and synchronous bilateral unresectable liver metastases. Chemotherapy with FOLFOX and cetuximab was initiated, with subsequent conversion to resectability of the CRLM. The patient underwent colectomy followed by right liver posterior sectionectomy with wedge resection of segment 5. Resection of tumor impinging on the left and middle hepatic veins would have required left hepatectomy, with insufficient remnant liver volume. The CRLM were meticulously dissected off the hepatic veins leaving a microscopically positive margin, and IRE was then used for margin ablation, leaving intact hepatic veins and venous blood flow. The patient is alive and without recurrent disease now 30 months after resection. Herein we review the IRE technology and its use in ablation of liver metastases.ConclusionsUse of IRE margin ablation for microscopically-positive CRLM resection may lead to long-term patient survival; further prospective randomized trials are needed to confirm this finding.

340 Background: Locally advanced disease requiring pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) with venous reconstruction is a controversial topic that is often determined by careful patient selection. There are numerous published single institution, but sparse multicenter studies, demonstrating the safety and efficacy of PD with venous reconstruction. The goal of this study is to evaluate survival outcomes in patients who underwent a PD with our without venous reconstruction utilizing a large statewide database. Methods: The California Cancer Registry (CCR) was used to obtain data on all PD performed from 2000-2011. This data was merged with Office of Statewide Planning and Development data to obtain inpatient hospitalization data. ICD-09 codes were used to identify all PD with or without venous reconstruction. Data was obtained on demographics, disease process, surgery, hospitalization statistics, and survival. Venous reconstruction was divided into venous segmental resection with reconstruction (VSR) and primary repair of the vein with a patch (PR). Survival was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier Survival analysis (KM). Results: Data were obtained on 5,228 patients who underwent PD, 3.7% (161) underwent venous reconstruction (148; 2.8% VSR and 43; 0.8% PR). A significant overall survival difference between PD and all vascular reconstruction was observed (23 months vs 17 months respectively, p < 0.001). Further analysis revealed no significant difference in survival between standard PD and PD with PR (median 21 months; p = 0.2). However, there was a significant survival advantage of PD compared to PD with VSR (21 vs 16 months respectively, p < 0.001). Evaluation of length of stay and complications revealed no statistical difference (p = 0.07 and p = 0.8). Conclusions: Venous reconstruction in PD is associated with worse survival compared to PD alone. Interestingly, patients who had a PR had a better survival than VSR alone. Overall survival for all comers of vascular reconstruction remains inferior which reinforces the biology of disease as an important predictor of outcomes as well as shorter segment portal vein involvement conferring improved survival.