No abstract

Medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) is often due to the hereditary condition multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 (MEN2) and it is standard of care to offer genetic testing to all diagnosed patients. This study used the Kaiser Permanente integrated medical record system to identify patients at risk for MEN2, assess adherence to clinical practice guidelines, and offer genetic counseling and testing. A query of the electronic medical records system identified patients with MTC. All patients with MTC who had not had RET gene testing, as well as patients who had positive RET gene testing, but had not yet had genetic counseling, were contacted and offered a genetics consultation. The query identified 142 patients with MTC. Fifty-six (40%) of those patients had not had the RET testing that all endocrine professional groups recommend. Forty-nine patients were eligible for the outreach, and, from this, 14 patients were scheduled for genetic counseling. Of the 94 individuals at our institution who had RET genetic testing, 25 (27%) were positive for a mutation. Of the 82 apparently sporadic cases, 13 (16%) carried a RET mutation. A family history of endocrine cancer and younger age at diagnosis significantly increased the risk carrying a RET mutation. However, approximately half of RET-positive patients did not have a significant family history of cancer and one-third were over age 50 at diagnosis. This study concludes that a significant proportion of patients with MTC are not receiving standard of care genetic testing and reinforces previous research that sporadic-appearing cases of MTC are often, in fact, hereditary.

The introduction of screening for multiple high and moderate risk mutations in genes has resulted in a complex approach to patient care involving multiple disciplines. We sought to describe the feasibility of a single visit multidisciplinary approach to the management of patients with an identified high/moderate risk gene mutation. Patients who presented to our community hospital over a 1-year period who were found to have a high/moderate risk genetic mutation on a screening panel were referred to the High Risk Genetic Clinic. Thirty-five patients were included. The majority were female [34 (97.1%)], Hispanic [22 (62.9%)], with a family history of cancer [21 (60%)]. Mean age was 40.3 years. Most of the participants had a BRCA1 gene mutation [10 (28.6%)]. Patients were seen at the High Risk Genetic Clinic within a mean of 41.9 days from the day of genetic mutation diagnosis. Four patients did not show and were significantly younger (19.3 vs. 39.6 years, p = 0.014). In this community setting, we provided coordinated care within multiple disciplines related to a genetic mutation in a single clinic visit. Increased efforts at coordinating early care should be directed towards patients diagnosed at a younger age.

Screening practices for optic glioma are inconsistent. Most children with NF1 at risk for optic glioma do not have even one visit with an ophthalmologist. Children with NF1 can develop asymptomatic optic glioma as early as age 1 year. Annual ophthalmologic examination and screening for precocious puberty in children with NF1 is important for early diagnosis of optic gliomas and may reduce morbidity. [J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2016;53(6):334-338.].