2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2017.12.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Western Validation of a Novel Gastric Cancer Prognosis Prediction Model in US Gastric Cancer Patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although incidence and death rates are declining (131), advancements in prevention and treatment remain a priority. Five year survival rates drop to 20-30% or less once the cancer moves beyond the lining of the stomach (132). The majority of GC cases are advanced stage (133).…”
Section: Gastric Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although incidence and death rates are declining (131), advancements in prevention and treatment remain a priority. Five year survival rates drop to 20-30% or less once the cancer moves beyond the lining of the stomach (132). The majority of GC cases are advanced stage (133).…”
Section: Gastric Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Woo et al created a novel model to predict prognosis after gastrectomy for gastric cancer; the model had a good C‐statistic of 0.798‐0.868 in four external validation cohorts in three different countries 9 . However, the model showed a decreased C‐statistic of 0.762 when validated using the SEER dataset, but they did not show the calibration plot 43 . A major concern in these prediction models is that they have unsatisfactory generalizability and are thus are difficult to be widely used clinically.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although a model for the prognoses of patients with metastatic or recurrent GC and good PS who undergo chemotherapy as a first-line treatment has been modified before (7), some issues still need to be solved. Firstly, some important host-or tumor-related prognostic factors, such as coagulation markers and tumor biomarkers, that have been proved in the recent studies were not included in the previous prognostic model (12)(13)(14)(15). Secondly, there is no validation procedure in the previous prognostic model (7).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%