RationaleElectronic cigarettes (ECs) are becoming popular alternatives for smokers, but there has been limited study of their abuse liability.ObjectivesThe objective of this study was to evaluate the abuse liability of three Vuse Solo ECs, ranging from 14 to 36 mg in nicotine content, relative to high- and low-abuse liability comparator products (usual brand combustible cigarettes and nicotine gum, respectively) in a group of 45 EC-naïve smokers.MethodsEnrolled subjects’ ratings of subjective effects and nicotine uptake over 6 h were used to measure abuse liability and pharmacokinetics following in-clinic use of each EC.ResultsUse of Vuse Solo resulted in subjective measures and nicotine uptake that were between those of combustible cigarettes and nicotine gum, although generally closer to nicotine gum. Compared to combustible cigarettes, use of Vuse Solo resulted in significantly lower scores in measures of product liking, positive effects, and intent to use again. These pharmacodynamic findings were consistent with the pharmacokinetic data, showing that cigarettes produced substantially faster and higher levels of nicotine uptake as compared to Vuse Solo and nicotine gum. Vuse Solo resulted in more rapid initial uptake of nicotine compared to nicotine gum, but peak concentration and long-term extent of uptake were not different or were lower with Vuse.ConclusionsCollectively, these findings suggest that Vuse Solo likely has an abuse liability that is somewhat greater than nicotine gum but lower than cigarettes.Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02269514Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00213-017-4665-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Higher levels of exposure to nicotine and some N'-nitrosamines may be observed in MSC, and SMK are exposed to higher levels of combustion-related toxicants. Changes in BioEff consistent with some aspects of inflammation, oxidative stress, and altered lipid metabolism were detected in SMK compared to the non-smoking groups. The biomarker data further improve our understanding of pathophysiological changes and the risk continuum associated with various tobacco products, and could be useful components of future assessments of tobacco products.

A study was conducted to evaluate biomarkers of biological effect and physiological assessments related to cardiovascular disease (CVD) among adult male cigarette smokers (SMK), moist snuff consumers (MSC) and non-consumers of tobacco (NTC). Additionally, biomarkers of tobacco and tobacco smoke exposure (BoE) were measured in spot urines and are reported here. Except for the BoE to nicotine and NNK, BoE were generally greater in SMK compared with MSC, and BoE were generally not different in comparisons of MSC and NTC. Results demonstrated that MSC had lower systemic exposures to many harmful and potentially harmful constituents than SMK, which is consistent with epidemiological data that indicate a differential in CVD risk between these groups.

No abstract

A randomized, multi-center study of adult cigarette smokers switched to tobacco-heating cigarettes, snus or ultra-low machine yield tobacco-burning cigarettes (50/group) for 24 weeks was conducted. Evaluation of biomarkers of biological effect (e.g. inflammation, lipids, hypercoaguable state) indicated that the majority of consistent and statistically significant improvements over time within each group were observed in markers of inflammation. Consistent and statistically significant differences in pairwise comparisons between product groups were not observed. These findings are relevant to the understanding of biomarkers of biological effect related to cigarette smoking as well as the risk continuum across various tobacco products (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02061917).

A randomized, multi-center study of adult cigarette smokers switched to tobacco-heating cigarettes, snus or ultra-low machine yield tobacco-burning cigarettes (50/group) was conducted, and subjects’ experience with the products was followed for 24 weeks. Differences in biomarkers of tobacco exposure between smokers and never smokers at baseline and among groups relative to each other and over time were assessed. Results indicated reduced exposure to many potentially harmful constituents found in cigarette smoke following product switching. Findings support differences in exposure from the use of various tobacco products and are relevant to the understanding of a risk continuum among tobacco products (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02061917).

An age-stratified, cross-sectional study was conducted in the US among healthy adult male cigarette smokers, moist snuff consumers, and non-tobacco consumers to evaluate cardiovascular biomarkers of biological effect (BoBE). Physiological assessments included flow-mediated dilation, ankle-brachial index, carotid intima-media thickness and expired carbon monoxide. Approximately one-half of the measured serum BoBE showed statistically significant differences; IL-12(p70), sICAM-1 and IL-8 were the BoBE that best differentiated among the three groups. A significant difference in ABI was observed between the cigarette smokers and non-tobacco consumer groups. Significant group and age effect differences in select biomarkers were identified.

Background: The existing US epidemiological data show that long-term cigarette smokers are at higher risk of developing serious diseases relative to moist snuff consumers. To understand the effects of tobacco consumption, global metabolomic profiles were generated. Here, we describe metabolomic changes in oxidative stress and inflammation pathways. Methods: Matching plasma, urine, and saliva samples from chronic/long-term smokers (SMK), moist snuff consumers (MSC), and non-tobacco consumers (NTC), 40 subjects in each cohort, were collected in a crosssectional biomarker discovery study. Untargeted metabolomics and data analyses were performed using Metabolon's proprietary technology. Results: Several biochemicals that significantly differed between study cohorts were identified in all three matrices, with most metabolites found in urine. Random forest analyses of the metabolomes grouped study subjects with a high accuracy and indicated that nicotine and its metabolites primarily drive separation between the NTC and MSC; otherwise, metabolomic profiles of NTC and MSC are more similar to each other, and SMK appear to manifest a distinct metabolomic profile. SMK exhibit lower levels of antioxidants, changes in glutathione metabolism and purine degradation pathways, docosahexaenoate, arachidonate, and 12-hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acid, suggesting increased oxidative stress and inflammation relative to MSC and NTC. Conclusions: Metabolomic profiles show that while SMK and MSC cohorts exhibit higher levels of nicotine and its metabolites, SMK manifest evidence of increased oxidative stress and inflammation relative to MSC and NTC. These observed biochemical changes in the SMK could be likely due to the combustion-related toxicants present in cigarette smoke. Impact: Several differentiating metabolites identified herein could be utilized as potential biomarkers of effect. Further, the metabolomic profiles improve our understanding of biological changes in tobacco consumers.