A prospective measurement of follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) and oestradiol between cycle days 2 and 5 was conducted to investigate the intra- and inter-cycle variability in a healthy population of women with regular menstrual intervals. Daily serum samples were obtained from 44 women for a total of 66 cycles on cycle days 2, 3, 4 and 5. FSH concentrations were consistent on all cycle days measured. Oestradiol concentrations on cycle day 2 were not different from cycle day 3, but concentrations on cycle day 4 and cycle day 5 were statistically different from both cycle day 2 and cycle day 3 by analysis of variance (P < or = 0.05). Evaluation of functional ovarian reserved by cycle day 3 FSH measurement has become the standard in most assisted reproductive technology programmes. The recent change in FSH standardization coupled with the inflexibility of cycle day 3 testing has led to a re-evaluation of testing protocols. Cycle day 3 appears to have emerged as a dictum because most ovulation induction protocols are initiated on cycle day 3, 4 or 5. Flexibility of sampling day can be introduced as suggested by these results. The additional information ascertained from oestradiol testing as applied to evaluation of ovarian reserve warrants further investigation.
The objective of this study was to investigate intra-observer as well as inter-observer variability in the assessment of laparoscopic scoring of adhesive disease. Patients with suspected pelvic adhesions underwent a laparoscopic examination and surgical correction, using a standardized adhesion scoring system for severity as well as for extent of the adhesive process. An active agent or placebo was placed in the peritoneal cavity to discourage reformation of adhesions on a double-blind basis. A second laparoscopy was performed in 6-10 weeks and patients were re-scored. The videotapes were viewed and re-scored by the operator and four other gynaecological surgeons on two occasions, 3 months apart. Both adhesion severity and extent scores were lower following laparoscopic intervention. Reliability coefficients as defined by intra-class correlations were large indicating good reliability (0.778 and 0.758 for severity and extent respectively). Intra-observer (replication) variability was 12% of the total versus 19% for inter-observer variability of adhesion severity. These values were 15.4 and 22.3% of the total respectively, for adhesion extent. Individual observers tended to up-grade severity and minimize extent of adhesions when comparing the second with the first videotape views. The surgeon recorded greater adhesion score differences between the two procedures than the other observers. Though two physicians consistently had higher scores than two others, the intra-observer and interobserver variabilities were acceptable. Consultant review of high quality videotaped laparoscopic procedures is a valid method of independent assessment of operative findings.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.