The prevalence of drug-related problems causing or contributing to admission to a clinic of internal medicine is high and is dominated by type A reactions, i.e. reactions in principle predictable and preventable. This implies a possibility to increase drug safety by preventive measures.
Based on this database, the use of antidepressants in early pregnancy does not seem to carry any significant risk for the infant that is detectable during the newborn period.
AimsTo define by amalgamation of data obtained in contemporaneous case-control studies, the risks associated with individual nonaspirin nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NANSAIDs) according to doses used. Methods Meta-analysis of individual patient data from three retrospective casecontrol studies using similar data collection protocols was carried out in hospitals in Catalonia, England, Scotland and Sweden. 2472 cases of upper gastrointestinal bleeding and 5877 controls were studied. Main outcome measures were risks associated with individual NANSAIDs according to dose used and the period of time for which they were given. Results Ibuprofen showed the lowest odds ratio (OR = 1.7; 95% confidence interval 1.1, 2.5), followed by diclofenac (4.9; 3.3, 7.1), indomethacin (6.0; 3.6, 10.0), naproxen (9.1; 6.0-13.7), piroxicam (13.1; 7.9-21.8) and ketoprofen (34.9; 12.7, 96.5). Striking dose-response relationships were seen with four to eight-fold increases in risk within conventionally used dose ranges for all except ketoprofen, where numbers were too few to allow dose analysis. Across the class, risk was highest during the first week of use (11.7; 6.5, 21.0), decreased thereafter with continuing use (5.6; 4.6, 7.0), and fell to 3.2 (2.1, 5.1) 1 week after discontinuing use. Concurrent use of more than one NANSAID substantially increased risk. Conclusions The risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding with NANSAIDs varies twenty-fold depending on the drug, and by three to seven-fold depending on the dose chosen. Risk is maximal during the first week and decreases thereafter. Paracetamol (acetaminophen) is not associated with upper gastrointestinal bleeding at any dose and should be the first-line analgesic wherever possible.
In the largest series of patients with glibenclamide-associated hypoglycaemia reported so far, 51 cases reported to the Swedish Adverse Drug Reactions Advisory Committee and six additional cases are reviewed and related to sales and prescription data of glibenclamide. Median age of the patients with hypoglycaemia was 75 years and 21% were 85 years or above. For comparison, the median age of a random sample (1 in 288 of all patients prescribed glibenclamide) was 70 years and only 5% were 85 years or older. In eight out of 40 cases where duration of glibenclamide treatment was recorded, the hypoglycaemic event occurred during the first month of treatment. The median daily dose of glibenclamide prescribed was 10 mg both in the hypoglycaemic cases and in the prescription sample. Coma or disturbed consciousness was the most common clinical presentation in this series and the minimum blood glucose value was 1.3 mmol/l (median). Twenty-two patients responded immediately to treatment, 24 had protracted hypoglycaemia of 12-72 h duration and 10 died. Fatal outcome was observed even with small doses of glibenclamide (2.5-5 mg/day). Previous strokes and cardiac disorders were isolated as two independent determinants of a serious course of the hypoglycaemia. Other contributing factors included impaired renal function, low food intake, diarrhoea, alcohol intake and interaction with other drugs. Thus, it is not uncommon for glibenclamide, like the first-generation sulphonylureas, to cause serious, protracted and even fatal hypoglycaemic events.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.