What is already known about this subject • Although drugs generally are safe and effective therapies for numerous diseases, adverse drug reactions do occur and may even be fatal. • The incidence of fatal adverse drug reactions in hospitalized patients has been estimated to be approximately 5%. • In previous studies the incidence of fatal adverse drug reactions in hospitalized patients has been reported, but the incidence of fatal adverse drug reactions in the general population is largely unknown. What this study adds • Fatal adverse drug reactions account for approximately 3% of all deaths in the general population. • Haemorrhages amount to almost two‐thirds of the fatal adverse drug reactions and antithrombotic agents are implicated in more than half of the suspected fatal adverse drug reactions. • Fatal adverse drug reactions are estimated to be the seventh most common cause of death in Sweden. Aims To determine the incidence of fatal adverse drug reactions (FADRs) in a Swedish population. Methods Every seventh randomly selected deceased in three counties in South‐east Sweden during 1 January 2001–31 December 2001 was identified in the Cause of Death Register. Relevant case records (hospitals and/or primary care centres and medicolegal files) were reviewed to identify suspected drug‐related fatalities. Results Of 1574 deceased study subjects, 49 (3.1%; 95% CI 2.2%, 4.0%) were suspected to have died from FADRs. The most common suspected FADRs were gastrointestinal haemorrhages (n = 18; 37%), central nervous system haemorrhages (n = 14; 29%), cardiovascular disorders (n = 5; 10%), other haemorrhages (n = 4; 8%) and renal dysfunction (n = 3; 6%). The drugs most commonly implicated in FADRs were antithrombotic drugs (n = 31; 63%), followed by nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) (n = 9; 18%), antidepressants (n = 7; 14%) and cardiovascular drugs (n = 4; 8%). Of all the 639 fatalities in hospital 41 (6.4%; 95% CI 4.5%, 8.3%) were suspected to be due to FADRs. Conclusions The medical burden of FADRs is significant. Haemorrhages were seen in a majority of the FADRs; antithrombotic agents or NSAIDs were implicated in most of these events. These results suggest that preventive measures should be taken to reduce the number of deaths caused by drugs.
Background Numerous observational studies suggest that preventable adverse drug reactions are a significant burden in healthcare, but no meta-analysis using a standardised definition for adverse drug reactions exists. The aim of the study was to estimate the percentage of patients with preventable adverse drug reactions and the preventability of adverse drug reactions in adult outpatients and inpatients. Methods Studies were identified through searching Cochrane, CINAHL, EMBASE, IPA, Medline, PsycINFO and Web of Science in September 2010, and by hand searching the reference lists of identified papers. Original peer-reviewed research articles in English that defined adverse drug reactions according to WHO’s or similar definition and assessed preventability were included. Disease or treatment specific studies were excluded. Meta-analysis on the percentage of patients with preventable adverse drug reactions and the preventability of adverse drug reactions was conducted. Results Data were analysed from 16 original studies on outpatients with 48797 emergency visits or hospital admissions and from 8 studies involving 24128 inpatients. No studies in primary care were identified. Among adult outpatients, 2.0% (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.2–3.2%) had preventable adverse drug reactions and 52% (95% CI: 42–62%) of adverse drug reactions were preventable. Among inpatients, 1.6% (95% CI: 0.1–51%) had preventable adverse drug reactions and 45% (95% CI: 33–58%) of adverse drug reactions were preventable. Conclusions This meta-analysis corroborates that preventable adverse drug reactions are a significant burden to healthcare among adult outpatients. Among both outpatients and inpatients, approximately half of adverse drug reactions are preventable, demonstrating that further evidence on prevention strategies is required. The percentage of patients with preventable adverse drug reactions among inpatients and in primary care is largely unknown and should be investigated in future research.
The prevalence of drug-related problems causing or contributing to admission to a clinic of internal medicine is high and is dominated by type A reactions, i.e. reactions in principle predictable and preventable. This implies a possibility to increase drug safety by preventive measures.
Myocarditis has in several case reports been associated with use of clozapine. Eight cases of myocarditis during treatment with clozapine that were submitted to the Swedish Adverse Drug Reaction Advisory Committee and 18 cases that were reported in the literature are summarized. As part of the routine signal detection process on the World Health Organization (WHO) Program on International Drug Monitoring database, which contains more than two million case reports of spontaneously reported suspected adverse drug reactions, a Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN) is used. This article also shows the retrospective output of the BCPNN over time for clozapine and myocarditis and discusses its implications. In 19 (79%; duration of treatment not stated for 2 patients) of 24 patients with myocarditis, the symptoms occurred within the first 6 weeks of clozapine treatment. Many patients shared a similar clinical course, with symptoms such as an influenza-like illness, fever, sinus tachycardia, hypotension, chest discomfort, and heart failure. The reaction was fatal in 12 (46%) of these patients. The other patients generally had a prompt recovery. By using the BCPNN technique, a quantitative association between clozapine and myocarditis was demonstrated, and the association might have been high-lighted for clinical review in 1994 had this BCPNN method been in use at the WHO center at the time. Myocarditis seems to be a rare and potentially lethal adverse effect of clozapine. Admittance for observation, interruption of the clozapine treatment, and treatment with corticosteroids should be considered for patients in whom this reaction is suspected.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.