No abstract

When compared with years 2004-2009, the present series showed an increasing trend of intraocular malignant lymphoma, bacterial endophthalmitis, and chronic iridocyclitis, and a notable increase in chronic iridocyclitis in young girls, with decreasing trends of scleritis and Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada disease.

No abstract

PurposeTo compare the performance of newly proposed point-wise linear regression (PLR) with the binomial test (binomial PLR) against mean deviation (MD) trend analysis and permutation analyses of PLR (PoPLR), in detecting global visual field (VF) progression in glaucoma.Methods15 VFs (Humphrey Field Analyzer, SITA standard, 24-2) were collected from 96 eyes of 59 open angle glaucoma patients (6.0 ± 1.5 [mean ± standard deviation] years). Using the total deviation of each point on the 2nd to 16th VFs (VF2-16), linear regression analysis was carried out. The numbers of VF test points with a significant trend at various probability levels (p<0.025, 0.05, 0.075 and 0.1) were investigated with the binomial test (one-side). A VF series was defined as “significant” if the median p-value from the binomial test was <0.025. Similarly, the progression analysis was carried out using only second to sixth VFs (VF2-6). The performance of each method was evaluated using the ‘consistency measures’; proportion both significant (PBS): both VF series (VF2-6 and VF2-16) were “significant”, proportion both were not significant (PBNS): both were “not significant”, proportion inconsistently significant (PIS): VF2-16 was “not significant” but VF2-6 was “significant”. A similar analysis was carried out using VF2-7 and VF2-15 series, and the performance was compared with MD trend analysis and PoPLR.ResultsThe PBS of the binomial PLR method (0.14 to 0.86) was significantly higher than MD trend analysis (0.04 to 0.89) and PoPLR (0.09 to 0.93). The PIS of the proposed method (0.0 to 0.17) was significantly lower than the MD approach (0.0 to 0.67) and PoPLR (0.07 to 0.33). The PBNS of the three approaches were not significantly different.ConclusionsThe binomial BLR method gives more consistent results than MD trend analysis and PoPLR, hence it will be helpful as a tool to ‘flag’ possible VF deterioration.

Purpose: This study evaluated the effectiveness and safety of first and revised second-generation trabecular microbypass stent insertion [iStent (IS) and iStent inject W (IW)] in cataract surgery. Design: Single-center, retrospective, cohort study. Methods: The study included 176 eyes that received trabecular microbypass stents combined with cataract surgery at the Saitama Red Cross Hospital between September 2017 and September 2021. Patients were divided into IS and IW groups depending on the implant type. Demographic characteristics, intraocular pressure (IOP), and the number of antiglaucoma medications (Med) were analyzed preoperatively and 12 months postoperatively. In addition, postoperative complications were compared between the groups. Results: IS and IW were implanted in 86 eyes and 90 eyes, respectively. IOP and Med at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months decreased significantly from baseline in both groups (P = 0.04, P < 0.001, P < 0.001, P < 0.001, and P < 0.001, respectively, for IOP in the IS group; P = 0.02, P < 0.001, P < 0.001, P < 0.001, and P < 0.001, respectively, for IOP in the IW group; P = 0.03, P = 0.002, P < 0.001, P < 0.001, and P < 0.001, respectively, for Med in the IS group; and P < 0.001 for all time points for Med in the IW group). IOP did not vary significantly between the groups at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months postoperatively. Med was significantly lower in IW than IS at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months postoperatively (P < 0.001, P < 0.001, P = 0.002, P = 0.002, and P = 0.002, respectively). Hyphema and IOP >30 mm Hg (spike) occurred in 1.2% and 4.4%, and 1.2% and 3.3% of patients in the IS and IW groups, respectively. The probability of successful discontinuation of medications at 12 months postoperatively was 10.5% and 41.1%, respectively (P < 0.001). Conclusions: Postoperative Med was significantly lower in the IW group. Simultaneous insertion of IW in patients with glaucoma requiring cataract surgery may be preferred to IS because it reduces the burden of Med.