AimsInternational criteria for the diagnosis of ocular sarcoidosis (OS) was established by the first International Workshop on Ocular Sarcoidosis (IWOS) and validations studies revealed certain limitations of the criteria. To overcome the limitations, revised IWOS criteria was established in an international meeting. This manuscript was aimed at reporting the revised IWOS criteria.MethodsA consensus workshop was carried out to discuss and revise the IWOS criteria. The workshop was held on 27 April 2017, in Nusa Dua, Bali, Indonesia. Prior to the workshop, a questionnaire proposing revised criteria and consisting of one item for differential diagnosis, seven items for ocular clinical signs, 10 items for systemic investigations and three categories of diagnostic criteria was circulated to 30 uveitis specialists. Questionnaire items with over 75% support were taken as consensus agreement; items with below 50% support were taken as consensus disagreement and items with 50%–75% support were discussed at the workshop. Of the latter items, those supported by two-thirds majority in the workshop were taken as consensus agreement.ResultsThe survey and subsequent workshop reached consensus agreements of the revised criteria for the diagnosis of OS as follows: (1) other causes of granulomatous uveitis must be ruled out; (2) seven intraocular clinical signs suggestive of OS; (3) eight results of systemic investigations in suspected OS and (4) three categories of diagnostic criteria depending on biopsy results and combination of intraocular signs and results of systemic investigations.ConclusionsRevised IWOS criteria were proposed by a consensus workshop.

Patients with active uveitis at study entry who received adalimumab therapy were likely to achieve quiescence, improve visual acuity, and reduce their daily uveitis-related systemic corticosteroid use. Most patients with inactive uveitis at study entry sustained quiescence without a systemic corticosteroid dose increase. No new safety signals were identified.

Eighty Japanese children, aged 8-12 years, with a spherical equivalent refraction (SER) of − 1.00 to − 6.00 dioptres (D) were randomly allocated into two groups to receive either a combination of orthokeratology (OK) and 0.01% atropine solution (combination group) or monotherapy with OK (monotherapy group). Seventy-three subjects completed the 2-year study. Over the 2 years, axial length increased by 0.29 ± 0.20 mm (n = 38) and 0.40 ± 0.23 mm (n = 35) in the combination and monotherapy groups, respectively (P = 0.03). Interactions between combination treatment and age or SER did not reach significance level (age, P = 0.18; SER, P = 0.06). In the subgroup of subjects with an initial SER of − 1.00 to − 3.00 D, axial length increased by 0.30 ± 0.22 mm (n = 27) and 0.48 ± 0.22 mm (n = 23) in the combination and monotherapy groups, respectively (P = 0.005). In the − 3.01 to − 6.00 D subgroup, axial length increased by 0.27 ± 0.15 mm (n = 11) and 0.25 ± 0.17 mm (n = 12) in the combination and monotherapy groups, respectively (P = 0.74). The combination therapy may be effective for slowing axial elongation, especially in children with low initial myopia. The prevalence of myopia is increasing worldwide 1-3 and younger generations are affected more than others 4-6. Myopia progression in children is strongly associated with axial elongation 7. Retinal changes caused by axial elongation of high myopia increase the risks of myopic maculopathy, retinal detachment, glaucoma, and resulting blindness 4,8,9. Although controlling axial elongation is vital for reducing the risk of these complications, no treatment has yet been established to halt axial elongation. Recent studies, however, have provided evidence of effective methods to slow the progression of myopia. The Atropine for the Treatment of Myopia (ATOM) 1 study demonstrated that treatment with 1% atropine ophthalmic solution significantly suppressed the progression of myopia by about 80% compared to placebo over a 2-year period 10. However, 1% atropine produced secondary unwanted effects such as pupil dilation and loss of accommodation 11 , and rebound effect after cessation of treatment 12. Thus, in the ATOM2 study, 0.5%, 0.1%, and 0.01% atropine ophthalmic solutions were examined, leading to reduced myopia progression by about 75%, 70%, and 60%, respectively, compared to placebo in the ATOM1 study over a 2-year period 13-15. Because the secondary unwanted effects and rebound effect were scarcely seen in the 0.01% atropine group compared to the higher concentrations of atropine, 0.01% atropine was the most recommended. However, axial elongation was not suppressed significantly in the ATOM2 study. Recently, the low-concentration atropine for myopia progression (LAMP) study compared the efficacy of 0.05%, 0.025%, and 0.01% atropine ophthalmic solutions and placebo for suppressing myopia progression and axial elongation 16,17. The results showed that 0.05% atropine was the most effective for suppressing of myopia progression and axial elongation with tolerable secondary un...

No abstract

No abstract