The issue of risk assessment in public administration has now become particularly urgent. One of the objectives of public administration in the face of risk is to improve the well-being of the population. In order to improve the well-being of the country's population, reduce the risk of the consequences of the economic crisis of 2008-2010, long years of stagnation, the executive branch has come to modern methods of governance, the bright representative of which is the transition priority national projects. The use of such methods greatly strengthens the role of the state in the management of socioeconomic development. Both in May 2012 and in May 2018, the President of the Russian Federation in the "May decrees" defined the planned indicators for the main socioeconomic areas of the country's development. The authors considered priority national projects, which are defined in the Russian President's message as projects of social orientation. The article considers the reasons for the decline in the effectiveness of the implementation of the "May decrees" of the Russian President in 2012, the implementation of which according to various data amounted to 70%. One of the reasons is the lack of application of project management methods. however, there has recently been an understanding of the need for project management. The authors examine in detail the risks of implementing the "May decrees" of the Russian President in 2018, among which the inability to control the targets of most programs is highlighted. The reasons for the decline in the effectiveness of government programs at different levels of government have been identified, and there is a tendency to increase the number of risks depending on the level of governance. unfortunately, the impact of the risks increases. Among the reasons for the decline in the effectiveness of priority national projects are organizational problems (lack of necessary vocational education, management and organization problems, features of stimulating the work of public servants, features of industry competition, a decline in the rating of public bodies in the eyes of citizens)and psychological deficiencies associated with loss of trust and
The difficulties and problems faced by economic entities, countries and regions, in general, on the way to implementing the achievements and developments of Industry 4.0 have been designated in the article. Special attention has been paid to economic and production aspects, as well as changes in the relevant systems in the context of radical technological transformations. In particular, it has been established that markets are becoming oligopolistic, the role and importance of medium and small businesses is significantly increasing, the problems of social inequality and tension in connection with growing unemployment and the need for highly qualified personnel are becoming more acute. In addition, the features of competition for technologies, investments, sales markets, territories of productive forces location have been highlighted. Attention has also been focused on the main “revolutionary” trends in industrial development associated with the launch of the innovation and technological cycle initiated by “Industry 4.0”. Specific actions and measures have been identified to implement these trends into reality.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.