No abstract

No abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the lifecycle impacts of anaerobic primary treatment of domestic wastewater using anaerobic baffled reactors (ABRs) coupled with aerobic secondary treatment relative to conventional wastewater and sludge/biosolids treatment systems through the application of wastewater treatment modeling and three lifecycle-based analyses: environmental lifecycle assessment, net energy balance, and lifecycle costing. Data from two pilot-scale ABRs operated under ambient wastewater temperatures were used to model the anaerobic primary treatment process. To address uncertain parameters in the scale-up of pilot-scale anaerobic reactor data, uncertainty analysis and Monte Carlo simulation were employed. This study demonstrates that anaerobic primary treatment of domestic wastewater using ABRs can be incorporated with existing aerobic treatment strategies to reduce aeration demand, reduce sludge production, and increase energy generation. The net result of coupling anaerobic primary treatment with aerobic secondary treatment is a more favorable net energy balance, reduced environmental impacts in most examined categories, and lower lifecycle costs relative to conventional treatment configurations; however, the removal and/or capture of dissolved methane is required to reduce global warming impacts and increase on-site energy generation. With further study, anaerobic primary treatment can be a path forward for energy-positive wastewater treatment.

Mainstream anaerobic treatment of domestic wastewater is a promising energy-generating treatment strategy; however, such reactors operated in colder regions are not well characterized. Performance data from a pilot-scale, multiple-compartment anaerobic reactor taken over 786 days were subjected to comprehensive statistical analyses. Results suggest that chemical oxygen demand (COD) was a poor proxy for organics in anaerobic systems as oxygen demand from dissolved inorganic material, dissolved methane, and colloidal material influence dissolved and particulate COD measurements. Additionally, univariate and functional boxplots were useful in visualizing variability in contaminant concentrations and identifying statistical outliers. Further, significantly different dissolved organic removal and methane production was observed between operational years, suggesting that anaerobic reactor systems may not achieve steady-state performance within one year. Last, modeling multiple-compartment reactor systems will require data collected over at least two years to capture seasonal variations of the major anaerobic microbial functions occurring within each reactor compartment.

No abstract

Anaerobic hybrid reactor system for the generation of methane-rich biogas and energy. An energy-positive alternative to conventional primary treatment of raw domestic wastewater.

Modeled electrical energy generation from anaerobic primary treatment of domestic wastewater with baffled bioreactors. Energy generation from methane production exceeded energy use by conventional activated sludge in some scenarios.

This article is part of the special series "Consequences of Modern Warfare on Ecology and the Environment." The series presents a collection of views from global experts on the broad environmental science and policy challenges raised by ecocide as a result of war, providing data-driven, science-based insights that inform our understanding of the environmental impacts of war, and how they may be documented, characterized, and responded to.