No abstract

Coronary angiography using 4 Fr catheters may reduce access site complications, promote better utilization of outpatient facilities, but at a cost of suboptimal image quality. To determine whether 4 Fr diagnostic angiography with power injection (Acist, Minneapolis, MN) was equivalent to 6 Fr manual technique, 101 unselected patients were randomized to transfemoral coronary angiography with 4 or 6 Fr catheters. Procedural characteristics, angiographic quality scores, and results of 90 min ambulation were analyzed. Coronary angiographic quality scores using 4 Fr and 6 Fr catheters were equivalent (left coronary artery 4.73 +/- 0.6 vs. 4.80 +/- 0.65, P = 0.28; right coronary artery 4.98 +/- 90.13 vs. 4.97 +/- 0.16, P = 0.48). However, 4 Fr left ventriculographic image score was lower (4.53 +/- 0.68 vs. 4.83 +/- 0.42, P = 0.0002), attributed, in part, to a smaller injected contrast volume (32 +/- 11 vs. 37 +/- 4 mL, P = 0.001). The total study contrast volume was significantly less in the 4 Fr group (119 +/- 35 vs. 159 +/- 52 mL, P = 0.001). Complications related to early ambulation at 90 min were similar and minimal in both groups. Compared to 6 Fr manual contrast injection technique, diagnostic angiography through 4 Fr catheters with power contrast injection resulted in equivalent coronary angiographic image quality, slightly reduced but diagnostic left ventricular image quality, and significantly less contrast volume. Four Fr angiography facilitates early ambulation without compromising safety and image quality.

No abstract

The outcome of Holter analysis for ischemic events is greatly dependent upon how an ischemic event is defined. Consensus on how to define an ischemic event is urgently needed.

Compared with 6F catheters, diagnostic coronary angiographic and ventriculographic images with 4F catheters can be obtained with equivalent results using less radiographic contrast volume. Whether 4F coronary angiography would be superior using a power-assisted, operator-controlled technique compared with manual technique is unknown. To determine whether 4F coronary angiography using operator-controlled power injection (Acist, Minneapolis, MN) was equivalent or superior to the 4F manual technique, 96 unselected patients undergoing transfemoral coronary angiography were randomized to 4F catheter using a power injection or manual technique. Procedural characteristics and angiographic quality scores were analyzed. Comparing the 4F manual with the 4F power-injection technique, coronary angiographic quality scores were equivalent (left coronary artery 4.7 +/- 0.5 vs. 4.7 +/- 0.6, P = 0.99; right coronary artery 4.94 +/- 0.2 vs. 4.88 +/- 0.1, P = 0.21). Left ventriculography scores were lower in 4F Acist with similar contrast volumes. The total study contrast volume was significantly less in the 4F Acist group (119 +/- 35 vs. 149 +/- 49 ml, P = 0.001). Compared with the 4F manual contrast injection technique, diagnostic angiography through 4F catheters with power contrast injection resulted in equivalent coronary angiographic image quality with significantly less radiographic contrast volume.

To compare relative coronary artery vasodilator reserve (rCVR = CVRtarget/CVRreference) to myocardial perfusion stress imaging, 48 patients with coronary artery stenoses (61% +/- 16%; mean, +/- SD; range, 30%-91%) had measurements of target and reference vessel CVR (Doppler-tipped guidewire). rCVR was computed and compared to stress 201thallium or (99m)technetium-sestamibi myocardial tomography. Compared to 24 patients with negative stress imaging studies, 24 patients with positive stress studies had angiographically more severe stenoses (74% +/- 13% vs. 44% +/- 24%; P = 0.0005) with lower CVR(target) (1.68 +/- 0.55 vs. 2.46 +/- 0.74; P = 0.002) and lower rCVR (0.72 +/- 0.22 vs. 1.0 +/- 0.26; P < 0.003). Based on receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) cut points (CVR > 1.9; rCVR > 0.75), compared to CVR, rCVR had similar agreement (Kappa 0.54 vs. 0.50), sensitivity (63% vs. 71%), specificity (88% vs. 83%), and positive predictive value (83% vs. 81%) with myocardial perfusion tomography. A concordant CVRtarget/rCVR only slightly increased sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive values (77%, 90%, and 87%, respectively). Although rCVR, like CVR, correlates with stress myocardial perfusion imaging results, rCVR did not have significant incremental prognostic value over CVR alone for myocardial perfusion imaging. However, rCVR does provide additional information regarding the status of the microcirculation in patients with coronary artery disease and complements the CVR for lesion assessment.

These results indicate that left ventricular opacification and endocardial border visualization is significantly improved by using power harmonic imaging as compared to harmonics or fundamental imaging following both echo contrast agents. Furthermore, although Optison is clearly superior to Albunex in opacifying left ventricle, power harmonic imaging compensates for the less robust agent.

Coronary angiography remains the 'gold standard' for the diagnosis of epicardial coronary disease. However, precise quantification of stenosis severity is limited because of the complex three-dimensional geometry of epicardial plaques. To assist the angiographer in lesion assessment, several physiologic measurements have been developed to evaluate stenosis severity, including coronary flow reserve, relative coronary flow reserve and fractional flow reserve. Physiologic lesion assessment can also be an invaluable tool in coronary intervention, evaluating efficacy of angioplasty and stent deployment.