2001
DOI: 10.1067/mhj.2001.117608
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of intravenous contrast for left ventricular opacification and border definition on sensitivity and specificity of dobutamine stress echocardiography compared with coronary angiography in technically difficult patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
73
0
4

Year Published

2003
2003
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
73
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The present (16) reported that in 274 patients with known or suspected CAD who had undergone both contrast-enhanced DSE and coronary angiography, the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of detecting left anterior descending coronary artery disease were 78%, 89% and 86%, respectively. Dolan et al (17) studied 229 patients prospectively, 112 of whom had good at-rest echocardiography results with no contrast, and 117 had poor at-rest echocardiography results with Optison injection during DSE. The percentages of endocardial border visualization, wall thickening, sensitivity and specificity were compared between both groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present (16) reported that in 274 patients with known or suspected CAD who had undergone both contrast-enhanced DSE and coronary angiography, the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of detecting left anterior descending coronary artery disease were 78%, 89% and 86%, respectively. Dolan et al (17) studied 229 patients prospectively, 112 of whom had good at-rest echocardiography results with no contrast, and 117 had poor at-rest echocardiography results with Optison injection during DSE. The percentages of endocardial border visualization, wall thickening, sensitivity and specificity were compared between both groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As seen in figure 3, echo contrast improves endocardial border detection and therefore makes LV wall motion analysis 8 and LV ejection fraction assessment 9,10 more reliable. This improvement is reflected by an increase in intra-and inter-observer agreement of LV ejection fraction and volumes.…”
Section: Ejection Fractionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…8,20,21 The limited use of contrast in stress echocardiography in our centre is mainly due to the confidence of the observer during the described time period in its interpretation quality and to a lesser extent SonoVue costs. Because 3D real-time stress echocardiography suffers from a significant decrease in image quality compared with conventional 2D imaging we are convinced that contrast may play an even more important role in this new stress modality.…”
Section: Stress Echocardiographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some investigators have provided indirect evidence suggesting superior stress echocardiography performance in the detection of CAD with contrast. For example, LVO, during dobutamine stress echocardiography in patients with suboptimal acoustic windows, has shown sensitivity and specificity similar to noncontrast examinations in subjects with adequate images (34). In the largest trial of stress echocardiography with contrast (6), 300 consecutive outpatients underwent dobutamine testing using both noncontrast harmonic imaging and LVO.…”
Section: Lvo and Stress Echocardiographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stress echocardiography in conjunction with LVO has been studied mostly with dobutamine testing (6,26,(34)(35)(36)(37). In several trials, contrast use consistently improved endocardial depiction and confidence of interpretation during stress echocardiography.…”
Section: Lvo and Stress Echocardiographymentioning
confidence: 99%