Objective: To investigate whether prior testis magnetic resonance spectroscopy predicts the success or failure of micro-dissection testicular sperm extraction (micro-TESE) in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA). Material and Methods: Nine men with NOA who were scheduled for micro-TESE for the first time, 9 NOA men with a history of previous micro-TESE and 5 fertile men were enrolled. All NOA patients and fertile controls underwent testis spectroscopy. A multi-voxel spectroscopy sequence was used. Testicular signals of choline (Cho), creatine (Cr), myo-inositol (MI), lactate, and lipids were analyzed quantitatively and compared with the results of the micro-TESEs. Results: The most prominent peaks were Cho and Cr in the fertile controls and NOA subjects with positive sperm retrieval in the micro-TESE. A high Cho peak was detected in 87% of the NOA men with positive sperm retrieval. NOA men without sperm at the previous micro-TESE showed a marked decrease in Cho and Cr signals. For positive sperm retrieval in micro-TESE, the cutoff value of Cho was 1.46 ppm, the cutoff value of Cr was 1.43 ppm, and the cutoff value of MI was 0.79 ppm. Conclusion: Testis spectroscopy can be used as a non-invasive screening method to predict the success or failure of micro-TESE.
Single-incision needleless mini-slings exhibited similar cure rates as the trans-obturator mid-urethral slings from both the patient and clinician points of view in 24 months of follow-up. Mini-slings resulted in significantly less postoperative pain than trans-obturator mid-urethral slings.
The severity of preeclampsia cannot be determined by the level of proteinuria. However, when massive proteinuria is detected, the clinician should be more cautious about maternal and fetal complications.
OBJECTIVE:It is controversial whether medical or surgical treatment options have more successful results in ectopic pregnancy treatment. Although high pretreatment serum hCG levels have been known to be the most important predictor, the appropriate treatment modality for a specific range of hCG level remains unclear. Furthermore, the variables that make a patient a bad candidate for single-dose methotrexate treatment is unclear. The aim of this study was to identify predictive factors associated with the success of single-dose methotrexate treatment in women with ectopic pregnancy.METHODS:In this retrospective study, 101 women with tubal ectopic pregnancies who had been treated with single-dose methotrexate were selected. The gestational ages, pretreatment hCG values, ectopic mass size, and fluid presence in the abdomen were compared between the groups.RESULTS:The mean age of the patients was 30.6±5.8 (range, 19–42) years, and the gestational age at first injection was 7.0±2.13 (range, 2.3–13.6) weeks. The overall treatment success rate was 77.2% (n=79). The mean duration of hospital stay was 4.21±1.89 days in the successfully treated group and 6.92±2.13 days in the failure group (p<0.05). The rate of treatment failure in patients with abdominal fluid was 37.8%, and it was 12.7% in the non-fluid group (p=0.03). hCG values on days 1, 4, and 7 were significantly higher in the unsuccessful group (3887–2589 mIU/mL, 2814–1287 mIU/mL, and 1119–285 mIU/mL, respectively; p<0.05). The cutoff hCG value, which determined the failure of methotrexate treatment, was found to be 1362 mIU/mL.CONCLUSION:In present study, patients with hCG value <1362 mIU/mL were found to be good candidates for methotrexate treatment. Although not strictly decisional, this hCG threshold level can be used to decide on the likelihood of methotrexate success or failure. Detection of abdominal fluid on ultrasonography also can be assessed as a bad prognostic factor, but size of ectopic mass does not correlate with methotrexate treatment success.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.