Team ViGIR entered the 2013 DARPA Robotics Challenge (DRC) with a focus on developing software to enable an operator to guide a humanoid robot through the series of challenge tasks emulating disaster response scenarios. The overarching philosophy was to make our operators full team members and not just mere supervisors. We designed our operator control station (OCS) to allow multiple operators to request and share information as needed to maintain situational awareness under bandwidth constraints, while directing the robot to perform tasks with most planning and control taking place onboard the robot. Given the limited development time, we leveraged a number of open source libraries in both our onboard software and our OCS design; this included significant use of the robot operating system libraries and toolchain. This paper describes the high level approach, including the OCS design and major onboard components, and it presents our DRC Trials results. The paper concludes with a number of lessons learned that are being applied to the final phase of the competition and are useful for related projects as well. C 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Kohlbrecher et al.: Human-Robot Teaming for Rescue Missions • 353independence (Huang et al., 2007). The human members of the team function as supervisors who set high-level goals, teammates who assist the robot with perception tasks, and operators who directly change robot parameters to improve performance (Scholtz, 2003); as these roles change dynamically during a set task in our system, we will use the term operator generically. Following Bruemmer et al. (2002), we rarely operate in teleoperation where we directly control a joint value, and we primarily operate in shared mode where the operator specifies tasks or goal points. In shared mode, the robot plans its motions to avoid obstacles and then executes the motion only when given permission. Even when executing a footstep plan in autonomous mode, the operator still has supervisory control of the robot and can command the robot to stop walking at any time and safely revert to a standing posture.Team ViGIR entered the DRC as a "Track B" team competing in the DARPA Virtual Robotics Challenge (VRC). Initially, Team ViGIR was composed of TORC Robotics, 2 the Simulation, Systems Optimization, and Robotics Group at Technische Universität Darmstadt (TUD), 3 and the 3D Interaction Group at Virginia Tech. 4 With only eight months from program kickoff to the first competition, the team focused on providing basic robot capabilities needed for the three tasks in the VRC. A short overview of our VRC approach is available in Kohlbrecher et al. (2013).While the tasks and requirements for the VRC were based on those anticipated in a real scenario, there were important differences: sensor noise was low and more predictable, simple friction models were used, there was no need for calibrating sensors or joint angle offsets for the robot, and the environments were known ahead of time. The dynamic model used for simulating the Atlas robot was ava...

No abstract

Team ViGIR and Team Hector participated in the DARPA Robotics Challenge (DRC) Finals, held June 2015 in Pomona, California, along with 21 other teams from around the world. Both teams competed using the same high‐level software, in conjunction with independently developed low‐level software specific to their humanoid robots. On the basis of previous work on operator‐centric manipulation control at the level of affordances, we developed an approach that allows one or more human operators to share control authority with a high‐level behavior controller. This collaborative autonomy decreases the completion time of manipulation tasks, increases the reliability of the human‐robot team, and allows the operators to adjust the robotic system's autonomy on‐the‐fly. This article discusses the technical challenges we faced and overcame during our efforts to allow the human operators to interact with the robotic system at a higher level of abstraction and share control authority with it. We introduce and evaluate the proposed approach in the context of our two teams' participation in the DRC Finals. We also present additional, systematic experiments conducted in the lab afterward. Finally, we present a discussion about the lessons learned while transitioning between operator‐centered manipulation control and behavior‐centered manipulation control during competition.

The investigations of this paper are motivated by the scenario of a supervised semi-autonomous humanoid robot entering a mainly unknown, potentially degraded human environment to perform highly diverse disaster recovery tasks. For this purpose, the robot must be enabled to use any object it can find in the environment as tool for achieving its current manipulation task. This requires the use of potential unknown objects as well as known objects for new purposes (e.g. using a drill as a hammer). A recently proposed object template manipulation approach is extended to provide a semi-autonomous humanoid robot assisted by a remote human supervisor with the versatility needed to utilize objects in the described manner applying affordances [1] from other previously known objects. For an Atlas humanoid robot it is demonstrated how using a small set of such object templates with well defined affordances can be used to solve manipulation tasks using new unknown objects.

While recent advances in approaches for control of humanoid robot systems show promising results, consideration of fully integrated humanoid systems for solving complex tasks, such as disaster response, has only recently gained focus. In this paper, a software framework for humanoid disaster response robots is introduced. It provides newcomers as well as experienced researchers in humanoid robotics a comprehensive system comprising open source packages for locomotion, manipulation, perception, world modeling, behavior control, and operator interaction. The system uses the Robot Operating System (ROS) as a middleware, which has emerged as a de facto standard in robotics research in recent years. The described architecture and components allow for flexible interaction between operator(s) and robot from teleoperation to remotely supervised autonomous operation while considering bandwidth constraints. The components are self-contained and can be used either in combination with others or standalone. They have been developed and evaluated during participation in the DARPA Robotics Challenge, and their use for different tasks and parts of this competition are described.

No abstract

of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been made. The publisher remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

No abstract