Young Syrian refugees in the UK: a two-tier system of international protection?

Abstract

This article explores the experiences of young Syrian refugees in the UK. It looks at how settlement plays out for two 'types' of Syrian refugees, those resettled by the UK Government and those who claim asylum in the UK. Drawing on new empirical data from 484 Syrian refugees in the UK, the article compares and contrasts the two groups' access to educational provisions, the labour market and general support mechanisms that should, in principle, be equally available to all refugees. This reveals the scale and consequences of the existing two-tier system of international protection based entirely on how refugees come to be in the UK, rather than any objective analysis of their reason for flight. In doing so, the article seeks to contribute to debates about the process and implications of how host states label people, in this case by de facto treating resettled Syrians as the 'good' refugees, while those who arrive of their own volition, regardless of their needs, are viewed as more problematic.

Syrian refugees in digital news discourse: Depictions and reflections in Germany

“…The already cited Kapa Research study (2016) also reported that the UK was amongst key destinations for Syrian refugees, however, as for example, Karyotis et al (2018) emphasize, strong anti-immigration attitudes were observed amongst British population and may even have been “a key factor in the victory of the ‘Leave’ campaign [i.e. the ‘Brexit’] on the EU Referendum in June 2016” (Karyotis et al 2018: 4). This is certainly reflected in the term crisis being so salient in our British data from 2015, whereas it seems that the tone in 2016 is getting more humanitarian in general.…”

‘We are, by nature, a tolerant people’: Securitisation and counter-securitisation in UK migration politics

“…The empirical focus covers the period 2005 to 2015, coinciding with a transformative decade for UK politics, which intensified debates about what it means to be British. The rise of support for far-right parties, UKIP in particular, coupled with the increase in anti-immigration attitudes and the gradual introduction of restrictive policies, did not only produce structural inequalities and a hostile environment for migrants in the UK 45 but also laid down the foundations for the Brexit vote. 46 With each of the three largest parties in the UK spending time in government during this decade and increasingly adopting hard-line positions on immigration in pursuit of electoral gains, 47 public anxieties about non-citizens sky-rocketed, consistently placing migration first or second in a list of 'the most important issues facing Britain today.'…”

Migrant Solidarity Work in Times of ‘Crisis’: Glasgow and the Politics of Place

“…This created a two-tiered system of entitlement to support, reinforcing a hierarchy of deservingness and narrow definition of 'genuine refugees': two Syrians from the same street can be treated very differently on the basis of how they arrived in the UK (Karyotis et al 2020). For those not considered legitimate refugees, including most non-Syrians, things are even worse, with the culture of disbelief and suspicion prominent (Souter 2011).…”