2019
DOI: 10.1590/1982-4327e2901
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Work-Related Flow Inventory: Evidence of Validity of the Brazilian Version

Abstract: Flow in work is constituted by the positive experiences and mental state experienced during the day-to-day occupational activities. This study aims to adapt and assess the psychometric properties of the Brazilian Version of the Work Related Flow Inventory (WOLF). Participants were a nationwide sample of 640 professional (74% women), aged 19 to 73 years (M = 35.9, SD = 10.5). Confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) supported the oblique three-factor structure (absorption, work enjoyment and intrinsic work motivation… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Currently in Brazil, there are few validated instruments to measure flow. The Work-Related Flow Inventory (WOLF), developed by Bakker (2008) and adapted to Brazil by Freitas et al (2019), measures flow at work. The short versions of the Flow State Scale (FSS-2) and of the Dispositional Flow Scale (DFS-2) (Jackson et al 2010) have already been translated into Brazilian Portuguese; however, there are no publications concerning their validity studies.…”
Section: Flow Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently in Brazil, there are few validated instruments to measure flow. The Work-Related Flow Inventory (WOLF), developed by Bakker (2008) and adapted to Brazil by Freitas et al (2019), measures flow at work. The short versions of the Flow State Scale (FSS-2) and of the Dispositional Flow Scale (DFS-2) (Jackson et al 2010) have already been translated into Brazilian Portuguese; however, there are no publications concerning their validity studies.…”
Section: Flow Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using multiple samples of employees from different occupational groups in Netherlands, Bakker (2008) provided empirical support for the three-factor CFA model consistent with the original design of three components for the measure, over the one-factor model (i.e., only the general factor of flow), and a couple of competing two-factor models. In general, the three-factor structure of the WOLF has also been supported in other cultural settings, such as South Africa (Geyser et al, 2015), Brazil (Freitas et al, 2019), Italy (Colombo et al, 2013;Zito et al, 2015), Turkey (Zekioglu et al, 2017), and China (Zeng, 2013;Chen et al, 2016). However, most research indicated that this three-factor model typically only showed borderline model fit at best (e.g., Bakker, 2008;Chen et al, 2016), especially with the consideration of the widely used criteria for model fit assessment (Hu and Bentler, 1999).…”
Section: Psychometric Characteristics and Latent Structure Of The Wolfmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Three subscales were used to assess absorption (four items), enjoyment (four items) and intrinsic motivation (five items). Items presented adequate internal consistency indices: absorption, α = 0.92; enjoyment, α = 0.97; and intrinsic motivation, α = 0.87) (Freitas et al, 2019). The inventory showed internal consistency (α = 0.94) and satisfactory fit indices (CFI = 0.93; TLI = 0.92; RMSEA (90% CI) = 0.13 (0.12 -0.14) in the sample studied.…”
Section: Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The instrument presented internal consistency for the dimensions of positive mental health (emotional wellbeing, α = 0.88; psychological well-being, α = 0.89; and social well-being, α = 0.85) and satisfactory fit indices (CFI = 0.96; TLI = 0.95; RMSEA (90% CI) = 0.10 (0.09 -0.11)) in the present sample. • Work-Related Flow Inventory -WOLF (Bakker, 2008, adapted to Brazilian Portuguese by Freitas, Damásio, Haddad, & Koller, 2019): the scale consists of 13 items answered according to a seven-point Likert scale (1 = never to 7 = always). Three subscales were used to assess absorption (four items), enjoyment (four items) and intrinsic motivation (five items).…”
Section: Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%