2012
DOI: 10.3109/0284186x.2012.707788
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Women with inoperable or locally advanced breast cancer – what characterizes them? A retrospective review of 157 cases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The evidence on the effects of chronic diseases on cancer stage is mixed, with some studies indicating an association with advanced stage [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31] , others showing no effect [32][33][34] and some reporting a reduced risk of advanced stage 19,22,25,28,31,34,35 for patients with chronic diseases (Figure 1). Hereafter we report estimates only if statistically significant.…”
Section: Cancer Stage At Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The evidence on the effects of chronic diseases on cancer stage is mixed, with some studies indicating an association with advanced stage [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31] , others showing no effect [32][33][34] and some reporting a reduced risk of advanced stage 19,22,25,28,31,34,35 for patients with chronic diseases (Figure 1). Hereafter we report estimates only if statistically significant.…”
Section: Cancer Stage At Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They showed that despite equal access to cancer care-related services, common explanations for nonadherence included limited knowledge about preventive or cancer care resources and denial or fear. Furthermore, it appears that women with locally advanced breast cancer are more likely to suffer from psychiatric comorbidity and more often live alone [ 15 ]. In our case, the melancholic episode may have delayed the diagnosis of soft tissue metastases, due to the denial of imaging and medical treatment of the patient.…”
Section: Discussion and Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%