2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2018.08.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Willingness to pay more for green products: The interplay of consumer characteristics and customer participation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
100
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 208 publications
(160 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
6
100
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Driven by this new mindset, people will have a sense of guilt and shame for their actions that may damage the environment, so they will consciously avoid doing harm to the environment when purchasing products [ 63 , 67 ]. Generally speaking, people with higher ecological literacy are more willing to pay more for environmental protection products [ 60 ]. Dong et al [ 16 ] studied the green purchase behavior of consumers from the perspective of the relationship between humans and nature, in which a commitment to nature reflects the human love for nature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Driven by this new mindset, people will have a sense of guilt and shame for their actions that may damage the environment, so they will consciously avoid doing harm to the environment when purchasing products [ 63 , 67 ]. Generally speaking, people with higher ecological literacy are more willing to pay more for environmental protection products [ 60 ]. Dong et al [ 16 ] studied the green purchase behavior of consumers from the perspective of the relationship between humans and nature, in which a commitment to nature reflects the human love for nature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data was collected through Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk), a frequently used crowdsourcing platform for human tasks such as surveys. MTurk allows researchers to anonymously recruit study participants based on pre-selected criteria such as country of residence and is frequently used in consumer survey research in the organic food sector [49]. To ensure reliable and valid results, we followed previous researchers' guidelines [50,51] for recruiting respondents through MTurk and employed measures such as restricting survey-takers to respondents with high MTurk approval ratings.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was conducted to test the factorial structure of the selected items from the questionnaire to develop reliable multi-item scales. The environmental concern (Cronbach's α = 0.736) scale, adapted from Wei, Ang, and Jancenelle [49] and De Magistris and Gracia [48], was operationalized with four statements, as was price consciousness (Cronbach's α = 0.801), the items of which were adapted from Gil and Soler [53]. Health consciousness (Cronbach's α = 0.902), which was adapted from Michaelidou and Hassan [54], was operationalized with six statements, as was hedonic shopping value (Cronbach's α = 0.955), using the items developed by Babin et al [26].…”
Section: Measurement Instruments and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Penelitian terdahulu yang membahas tentang aspek kepedulian lingkungan sudah banyak dilakukan. Misalnya penelitian tentang perilaku konsumi masyarakat desa dan kota (Ruwani et al, 2014;dan Setiyawidi et al, 2013); perilaku green comsumers (Utami et al, 2014;Tamam, 2016;Waskito & Harsono, 2012;dan Sulistianingsih, 2015); kesediaan membayar lebih untuk green product (Wei et al, 2018;dan Yulia & Untoro, 2016); dan penanganan sampah (Suryawan et al, 2015;dan Purnomo et al, 2017;Dongoran et al, 2018;dan Suwerda et al, 2019). Penelitian-penelitian tersebut belum ada yang membedakan kepedulian lingkungan antar masyarakat desa dan kota.…”
unclassified