Why is tobacco control progress in Indonesia stalled? - A qualitative analysis of interviews with tobacco control experts

Abstract

Introduction Indonesia shoulders a significant tobacco burden, with almost two million cases of tobacco-related illnesses and more than two hundred thousand tobacco-related deaths annually. Indonesian tobacco control is progressing but lags behind other countries. Our study evaluates factors that contribute to the slow progress of tobacco policy change in Indonesia from the perspective of tobacco control experts (TCEs). Method We conducted qualitative interviews with four international and ten national TCEs, who have been active in tobacco control for at least 5 years. Our interview guideline included questions on the current tobacco control situation in Indonesia and explored reasons why tobacco control is progressing so slowly. The interviews were conducted either in English or Bahasa Indonesia, recorded and then transcribed verbatim. We conducted a thematic analysis based on five core causal factors for policy adoption: institutions, networks, socio-economic factors, agendas and ideas. Results and Discussion The multistage delay of tobacco policy adoption is principally due to political structures and policy hierarchy, complex bureaucracy, unclear roles and responsibilities, and a high degree of corruption. The low bargaining position and lack of respect for the Ministry of Health also contributes. There are contrasting frames of tobacco as a strategic economic asset and tobacco control as a sovereignty threat. There is an imbalance of power and influence between well entrenched and resourced tobacco industry networks compared to relatively young and less established tobacco control networks. The policy agenda is likely influenced by the privileged position of tobacco in Indonesia as a socially acceptable product with high consumption. There are constraints on transferring ideas and evidence to successful policy adoption. Conclusion Tobacco companies have substantially influenced both policy decisions and public perceptions, signifying a power imbalance within the government system and broader networks. Acceding to and enforcing the World Health Organization-Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO-FCTC) would enable the Indonesian government to shift the power imbalance towards public health stakeholders. Tobacco control advocates must enhance their network cohesion and embrace other community groups to improve engagement and communication with policymakers.

Implementation of Smoke-Free Law in Denpasar Bali: Between Compliance and Social Norms of Smoking

“… 27 , 28 In Indonesia, this effect has not been achieved yet. Smoking has been a longstanding part of social life which has becomes a social norm in the society 29 , 30 and high social acceptability of smoking has been also partly due to extensive marketing of cigarettes. 31 Provision of cigarette becomes part of hospitality as well as tradition at almost every religious and customary event.…”

Tobacco Advertising, Promotion and Sponsorship in India and Indonesia: Present Regime and the Way Forward

“…The magnitude of cigarette business in Indonesia seems to be an important factor contributing to weak implementation of tobacco control laws. To give a perspective, Indonesia is the second largest cigarette market in the world, with an overall retail volume of 316.1 billion sticks per year in 2016 (Astuti et al, 2020). Barring outdoor tobacco advertising, Indonesia has not adopted a comprehensive ban on TAPS.…”

“…For example, the Indonesian Broadcasting Commission (KPI) would monitor violations of broadcast media advertisements and sub-national governments are responsible for any outdoor advertisements. This diversification of power among different monitoring agencies preclude a single effective focal agency to pursue and oversee the implementation of laws and bye-laws laid down to address TAPS in Indonesia (Astuti et al, 2020).…”

“…However, many countries, especially low-income and middle-income countries, primarily implement only partial TAPS bans, allowing the tobacco industry to directly or indirectly advertise and promote its products via multiple media (Septiono et al, 2021). Moreover, increasingly, a large proportion of tobacco advertising and promotion is being accomplished through emerging media such as websites and social media or at music and sports events which are increasingly becoming popular (Astuti and Freeman, 2018). Retail tobacco products advertising is another stumbling block in effective implementation of TAPS ban (Polanska and Kalet, 2021).…”

Opportunities and Challenges of Tobacco Control Policy at District Level in Indonesia: A Qualitative Analysis

“…Previous studies have attempted to explore factors that contribute to the slow progress of tobacco policy change in Indonesia from the perspective of national tobacco control experts (Astuti et al, 2020). However, such evidence is lacking at the local government level (i.e.…”